Thanks. The eye bolts are rated for about 400# each. So times that by 4 and it is more than the weight allowed for the shelf and the load.
But, I have thought about closing the bolts or just getting closed loop eye bolts. If that is the correct term.
Unfortunately if your load is not perfectly balanced, I don't think you have any safety factor left at all. And that's bad because safety factor is there partly to account for manufacturing defects, but also to allow for dynamic loading. Fuel sloshing in the tank, vibration from the motor, impulses from starting and stopping the winch, etc. all create dynamic load that is greater than the dead load of the platform, what you're lifting, and friction of the pulleys and rollers.
Also, the entire load (plus friction of the pulleys and rollers and increased load wherever the cables aren't perfectly straight) has to go through the one hook at the winch, so hopefully that's rated for your full load.
Easy rule of thumb unless you get a full load analysis of the entire system is to only lift as much as the weakest component can handle.
I also worry about the way the bolts are being used as locking pins. Bolts are meant to handle uniform tension and static shear load in a hole the exact size of the bolt.
Maybe the pictures aren't representative of how they look once they fully loaded in place, but having it at an angle means there is an angular load on the head of the bolt (the tack welds might help, assuming the heat didn't actually just make the bolt weaker since grade 8 bolts are usually heat treated).
The real problem is that the bolts are just loose in those slots. Normally a bolt in the correct size hole is fully supported on all sides, so the load is distributed across the whole side of the bolt. In your use, the load is only going through the small surface of the bolt in contact with the bottom of the unistrut slot, and the bolt has no support on the other side.
Obviously your lift is not going to fall apart just because I wrote all that... just beware that you have nowhere near the strength or safety that you could have with some changes. You're already being smart and not putting people under or on it. I'd suggest that when you have finished lifting you let enough weight rest on the locking bolts that they wouldn't move much if the cables broke. The dynamic load of a cable breaking for some reason if the bolts are loose would put WAY more load on those bolts than if they are already under some load.
I'd love to see some ideas for a better safety lock. The fundamental problem is that there's a reason normal lift safety locks have flat faces that bear on flat surfaces... to prevent point loading. Maybe you could reverse the struts and bolt blocks inside the channels which a square washer on the bolts could rest on? I like that gravity is doing the work you normally need a spring to do. Also, you have to avoid any load on the threaded part of the bolts... it can't take shear forces.
And to make a long post even longer... I'd add some diagonal bracing in the corners of the lifting frame to resist the side loads the pulleys put on the joints.