Michigan. 2 – bay garage was added to existing 1950’s home 1 – bay at a time between ~1950’s and - ~1980’s. Typical 2x4 stick framed construction for all. Open cell, 8x8x16 CMU (concrete block) foundation walls on footings for all. Garage foundation walls are only 2 – blocks tall. No apparent original anchoring to prevent uplift of foundation walls to footing or of rough sill plate to foundation. Probably some spikes driven through the sill plate into the CMU’s or mortar to inhibit lateral movement. All typical construction for timeframes and region, AFAIK.
Unless I trigger a requirement and/or AHJ demands it, would you concern yourself at all with any attempt at anchoring the garage, 2x8 sill plate to footing to prevent uplift?
I am in the planning phase of some structural improvements for the relevant garage that will essentially leave all existing structure in place except for the ceiling in the older bay. However, I will likely extend the depth of the load bearing walls inward to provide bearing for new ceiling joists. If I were to tie framing to footing in any code-prescriptive manner, it would likely most efficiently be done before plywood interior wall covering is installed on the new framing. However, my initial thoughts are it, barring AHJ requiring it, essentially being a waste of time as the attached house has no anchoring to prevent uplift, nor will it likely ever.
Unless I trigger a requirement and/or AHJ demands it, would you concern yourself at all with any attempt at anchoring the garage, 2x8 sill plate to footing to prevent uplift?
I am in the planning phase of some structural improvements for the relevant garage that will essentially leave all existing structure in place except for the ceiling in the older bay. However, I will likely extend the depth of the load bearing walls inward to provide bearing for new ceiling joists. If I were to tie framing to footing in any code-prescriptive manner, it would likely most efficiently be done before plywood interior wall covering is installed on the new framing. However, my initial thoughts are it, barring AHJ requiring it, essentially being a waste of time as the attached house has no anchoring to prevent uplift, nor will it likely ever.
