So I did that test by connecting the cutoff tool right to the compressor. It was cold in the garage and I didn't feel like pulling out a 50ft hose to do the test.
The 4 gallon compressor, per it's gauge said it was starting at just under 120psi (I should check that since it should fill to a bit higher) then kicked in at just under 90. I'm sure I could keep cutting at less than 90 but consider it was dropping about 10 psi/second. It wasn't going to run much longer. The big compressor fills to 135 on the gauge and kicks in at around 100 so the PSI drop is similar to the smaller one. At 100 psi the tank pressure is still higher than the tool's operating pressure thus no loss in performance.
I can't offer any insight into the CAT 15020 (or the Kobalt low noise 26 gallon that might be a better deal) or the Kobalt 2 stage beyond playing specs games. No doubt the 30 gallon Kobalt gives you a lot more tank and about 25% more pump. That's not insignificant on paper. I'm not sure how much it will come into real world play. Basically never for an impact. It could matter if you use a blow gun a lot.
OK, when I was helping my dad and brother out with some rebuilt compressors I created an Excel table to calculate fill times just to make sure the compressors were ball park hitting their specs. So as part of this discussion I found the video below.
The spreadsheet predicted 9:22 to fill from empty. He said it took 9:18. I had a private moment of pride
OK, so I used the same calculation to guess how much air my cutoff wheel used and how fast it would drain a compressor. An estimate of 25CFM seems right give how long it took to drain my small and large compressor. So ignoring the pump turning on, it would take about 20 seconds for the cutoff wheel to take my 20 gallon compressor from 135 psi to 90. The same calculation says the big Kobalt would take 56 second from 175psi to 90. Well, that would give you some pretty reasonable cutting time and honestly, since the pump would kick in at, probably 135 psi) you would probably get just over a minute of run time. It would then take about 4:30 to refill the tank to 175 psi. So yeah, that is a useful increase in run time before waiting vs my 20 gallon compressor. Of course, my 20 gallon with a lower peak pressure will refresh in 1:30. BTW, that semi-quiet Husky would, based on specs, match the two stake Kobalt.
So let's run that same calculation with the 15 gallon CAT and 26 gallon silent Kobalt.
CAT 1520: 150psi down to 90, 15 gallon tank, 25 cfm cutoff tool: 20 seconds, refill: 1:31, $410 (all but matches my 20 gallon compressor)
Kobalt 26gal quiet: 150psi down to 90, 26 gallon tank, 25 cfm cutoff tool: 34 seconds, refill: 3:10 $300
and the others:
Kobalt 30 gal 2 stage: 175psi down to 90, 30 gallon tank, 25 cfm cutoff tool: 56 seconds, refill: 4:33 $470
Husky 30 gal semi-quiet: 175psi down to 90, 30 gallon tank, 25 cfm cutoff tool: 56 seconds, refill: 4:33 $310
Dewalt 15gal:225 to 90, 15 gal, 25cfm tool: 44 sec, 3:30 refill, $410
Well, as much as I would like to have more shop projects these days I don't. I'm not going to wear out my compressor that fast so the universal motors (Husky and DeWalt) and oil free pumps (all but the 2 stage Kobalt) aren't drawbacks to me. Also, for the over $100 savings if I went with the 26gal or Husky would be more than enough to pay for a set of brushes and pump rebuild. If I were moving a lot the smaller size/weight of those designs would matter.
Of the lot I would probably pick the Husky because it's not too loud and noise isn't critical to me. If noise was critical I would probably pick the 26 gal because the performance hit isn't too bad vs the CAT and the cost savings is big.
Sorry, yet another long, rambling post.![]()
I can't thank you enough for this helpful post!

So here's what I'm thinking about each of these units:
Kobalt 30 Gallon - Pro: 175 PSI, 30 Gallons, 5.3CFM, Oiled pump Con: Loud
Husky 30 Gallon - Pro: 175 PSI, 30 Gallons , Cheaper than Kobalt Con: Loud (but quiter than Kobalt), 5.1 CFM (vs 5.3 on the Kobalt), Online reviews not as good as Kobalt, Oil Free pump
Dewalt - Pro: 225 PSI, 78dB (not bad), only $349 Con: 15 Gallons, Oil Free
CAT - Pro: Very low noise level, 5.3CFM , Quick refill time Con: 15 Gallons, Oil Free
Kobalt 26 Gallon - Will no longer consider due to low CFM @90
So it looks like a toss up between the Kobalt 30 gallon and the CAT 15020C.
What I like about the Kobalt, is that its a larger tank, and a higher PSI. The CAT on the other hand wins in the low noise department. But then there's the refill issue. You mentioned above that CAT will refill in 1:31, but Kobalt will take 4:33. At that point, I'm thinking, who cares if its a shorter run time if it'll take 3 minutes less to refill each time. I really don't know...


