To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

An odd question perhaps~

Franz©

Banned
Joined
Mar 26, 2006
Messages
1,006
Location
in a house
It occurrs to me I've seen epoxy type seamless flooring since 1967, going back to the original Torginol floors. It was an amazing product back then, especially when I saw the 1000 gal± that sat in the middle of a floor the morning it was discovered an underground water line leaked.

I also notice a lot of yall are putting it on garage floors, and somebody on here must be using it on a heated floor.

Now, it's just flat fact that plastics don't transmit heat well, I sure proved that with my inside storm windows made from 1/10 lucite, so I'm wondering how the floor heat works out when seamless flooring is installed on the floor.:confused:
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

bmwpower

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
12,578
Location
NJ
It occurrs to me I've seen epoxy type seamless flooring since 1967, going back to the original Torginol floors. It was an amazing product back then, especially when I saw the 1000 gal± that sat in the middle of a floor the morning it was discovered an underground water line leaked.

I also notice a lot of yall are putting it on garage floors, and somebody on here must be using it on a heated floor.

Now, it's just flat fact that plastics don't transmit heat well, I sure proved that with my inside storm windows made from 1/10 lucite, so I'm wondering how the floor heat works out when seamless flooring is installed on the floor.:confused:

I dont have floor heat, but I would imagine the thickness of it makes the barrier to heat negligible. We'r talking mils here...not realy thick.
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

mike944

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 18, 2006
Messages
337
Location
Vernon, CT
Yes, plastics don't transmit heat well, but since epoxy is applied in such a thin layer, the effect of this should be negligable at least compared to the concrete.

Concrete has an R-value of approximately .08/inch. Figure the radiant heat tubes are buried at least 2 inches, for an R-value of .16 for the concrete.

I couldn't find a direct R-value of epoxy, but a manufacturer of "insulating paint" claims a K-factor of 0.15 W/(mK) Doing the units conversion to R-value equals an R-value of .96 / inch. That means, that for roughly every 1/16" of epoxy, it's the same as burying the radiant heat tubes an inch deeper in the concrete.

Now, 1/16" is a LOT of epoxy. Most floor epoxys are much thinner than that. (100% solids paint would require 10 gal for a 1-car garage, to build up to 1/16") Now, some of the really, really expensive, high-build coatings for industrial floors can be up around 1/8". If you have one of these, it might make a difference, but for most of our coatings, i can't see how it would. Keeping in mind also, that the K-factor i found, was for a manufacturer claming specific insulating properties for his paint. Figure a paint not designed for insulating properties would be higher K (which means a lower R, since they are the inverse of each other)

If somebody a little more familiar with heat transfer wants to double check my math, i converted .15 W/MK to BTU.in/hr.ft2.F by multiplying by 6.94, and then took the inverse of the result to get R-value. I fould the conversion factors about halfway down this page http://users.aol.com/JackProot/met/spmisc.html
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!
Top Bottom