tuner4life
Well-known member
Alright, I know that there a million "what's best for me" threads out there, but I'm going to ask anyways.
I am going to be acquiring a property with a 30x40 pole barn. It has 12' or 14' doors on one end, so I'm assuming 14' or 16' ceilings (estimating, might be taller). Currently the only source of heat is a small wood burner. We haven't moved yet, so I don't know how effective it is, but I do work on cars quite a lot and am not a huge fan of the fumes/fire mix, and I have no desire to start chopping wood, so it's really not the best option for me.
There is a nat-gas line run into the building, but it is not hooked up to anything currently.
The 2 options I am comparing is either a hanging "box" style heater, or a hanging tube-style radiant heater. Now here are all of the dumb questions:
1) I'm assuming that efficiency-wise, the radiant tube heater will be cheaper to run, but which would heat more effectively? Faster? I do plan to leave it heated at least minimally at all times in the winter.
2) Since this building has taller ceilings, which heater is better for having heat reach floor level? Actually heating the concrete? Would I need fans to blow heat down?
3) If it was yours what would you pick and why? Any information I'm missing to make a more informed decision? It seems that from what I have read, a single tube radiant heater running lengthwise down the middle of the ceiling may be the best option, but will that heat the sides too, or only in the middle? I have no experience with that style heater.
Also, I want to eventually insulate the building as well as possible. It currently has what looks to be foam board against the walls. I can't tell how thick it is, Is it effective at all? Should I just get rid of it and start over? Leave it in and add something over it?
Sorry for the dumb questions. I'm new to having to heat this large of a space and am trying to do my homework.

I am going to be acquiring a property with a 30x40 pole barn. It has 12' or 14' doors on one end, so I'm assuming 14' or 16' ceilings (estimating, might be taller). Currently the only source of heat is a small wood burner. We haven't moved yet, so I don't know how effective it is, but I do work on cars quite a lot and am not a huge fan of the fumes/fire mix, and I have no desire to start chopping wood, so it's really not the best option for me.
There is a nat-gas line run into the building, but it is not hooked up to anything currently.
The 2 options I am comparing is either a hanging "box" style heater, or a hanging tube-style radiant heater. Now here are all of the dumb questions:
1) I'm assuming that efficiency-wise, the radiant tube heater will be cheaper to run, but which would heat more effectively? Faster? I do plan to leave it heated at least minimally at all times in the winter.
2) Since this building has taller ceilings, which heater is better for having heat reach floor level? Actually heating the concrete? Would I need fans to blow heat down?
3) If it was yours what would you pick and why? Any information I'm missing to make a more informed decision? It seems that from what I have read, a single tube radiant heater running lengthwise down the middle of the ceiling may be the best option, but will that heat the sides too, or only in the middle? I have no experience with that style heater.
Also, I want to eventually insulate the building as well as possible. It currently has what looks to be foam board against the walls. I can't tell how thick it is, Is it effective at all? Should I just get rid of it and start over? Leave it in and add something over it?
Sorry for the dumb questions. I'm new to having to heat this large of a space and am trying to do my homework.

Last edited: