Rather than encapsulate and condition the crawl space, I'm thinking about 2" of closed cell foam on the underside of the floor including the joist. That should insulate the house from the crawl space for temperature and moisture. We don't curently have moisture problems down there (20 year old house) and will continue to ventilate. Just looking to tighten it up and cut hearing cost, make it more uniform on temp in the winter. Anybody see something I'm misding?
I think you'd still have wasteful duct leakage into the uninsulated crawl, and you'd need to make sure that any structural wood was completely sealed off with the foam or you'd still have high moisture content in the wood which promotes mold and can lead to warping or decay. You'd also still have effects of moisture/condensation and possibly freeze/thaw cycles on HVAC, plumbing and electrical components which can shorten their useful lives.
It may also cost more. You'd have to do the math for your situation, but insulation tends to cost quite a bit more than vapor barrier materials. And in an encapsulated crawl, you're only insulating the walls which should be less sqft than the floor. The vapor barrier covers most of the sqft of the space, and the super thick, fancy ones cost about $0.35/sqft. Closed cell foam costs $1 or more per board foot, and you'd be doing a couple of board feet per sqft to achieve the thickness you want. You'd have to cover the underside of the floor boards (total sqft of the crawl) plus the cost of the two vertical faces of each joist and the sill plates.
This article is pretty informative: http://www.greenbuildingadvisor.com/blogs/dept/musings/building-unvented-crawl-space
The part that applies most to your question is probably: "According to researchers who conducted a careful study of vented and unvented crawl spaces in North Carolina, homes with sealed crawl spaces with insulated foundation walls use 18% less energy for heating and cooling than identical homes with vented crawl spaces with insulation between the floor joists."
Unfortunately, the link to that specific study is broken, but it's a good read on the subject from a good source.
Last edited:
