ritestuff
Well-known member
If you're using the tools to make a living, I think the better comparison is "******* Model" VS "Ugly Fat Chick". Both are capable of performing well, but.......................................
No one runs off with your HF tools,,,,,,,,,,,,,If you're using the tools to make a living, I think the better comparison is "******* Model" VS "Ugly Fat Chick". Both are capable of performing well, but.......................................
Half off it's worth it to buy and resell. With craftsman production going to china and the whole thread about sears going down if I had a discount like that I'd get them that way you're assured the wareenty and you won't get China ones in return from warranty. In the end it's up to you. I love the finish on my snap on wrenches and half off if I had the money I'd jump on it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
...and actually require less energy to torque (this is complicated, but I can explain)...
I'd love to hear THAT explanation. Are you're claiming that other brands of sockets are so elastic that you put significant torque into bending them before the fastener budges? Aside from that, the torque required on the fastener is purely a matter of the interface between the fastener and the part and/or nut—static friction, corrosion, and the tension on the fastener.
There are no magic SnapOn particles flowing through the metal of the fastener to the threads. The machining may be better, the fit less likely to strip the fastener, but the torque required to turn the fastener is the same.
Unless, of course, Snap On is the rightful heir to King Arthur:
Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk
and actually require less energy to torque (this is complicated, but I can explain).
Please do. I am scratching my head and trying to figure out what I missed during my engineering classes that could explain this.
Please do. I am scratching my head and trying to figure out what I missed during my engineering classes that could explain this.
Most engineers learn statics with a not often discussed assumption that components are infinitely rigid. This is Newtons 3rd law, which, like Newtonian fluid dynamics, is roughly true.
In reality, the effort we apply to a ratchet handle is reacted not only by the friction in the bolt threads and under the head, but also in elastically deforming every part, and creating heat. So in industry, most engineers use computer models called finite element models that take each elements stiffness into account. This is called a nonlinear analysis. I'd be very surprised if Snap On didn't have careful 3D computer models.
You think it matters?
Where you notice this particularly is in long extension stacks. If you combine several extensions, not only do you have a lot of takeup from slop in the joints, but the windup can be significant before you get to full torque. But, it's hard to sell that idea here. I've been ridiculed for stating that before.
The best example of this is torque sticks. When you reach a certain torque, they twist as much as the impact turns, so that you essentially don't transfer any torque. Just absorb the energy in the extension without transferring any to the bolt. Every extension does this to some extent, whether it's noticeable or not is a question that probably varies by the cross section of the extension and the properties of the steel. I'm sure the same happens with sockets. But, I suspect the fit of the socket, both on the bolt and on the extension or ratchet has more to do with it than the steel properties.
In applying engineering principles, always remember the model assumptions. Failures happen when the actual real world item doesn't meet the ideal model assumptions.
I am familiar with these things. Even my tiny underfunded engineering department used FEA 20 years ago - I bet all mfg's of sockets have used it for decades.Most engineers learn statics with a not often discussed assumption that components are infinitely rigid. This is Newtons 3rd law, which, like Newtonian fluid dynamics, is roughly true.
In reality, the effort we apply to a ratchet handle is reacted not only by the friction in the bolt threads and under the head, but also in elastically deforming every part, and creating heat. So in industry, most engineers use computer models called finite element models that take each elements stiffness into account. This is called a nonlinear analysis. I'd be very surprised if Snap On didn't have careful 3D computer models.
One of my buddies has the interesting job of dyno-testing marine engines. Think 1-6000 hp diesels in commercial vessels. He uses a strain gauge glued to the main shaft that goes to the propeller to measure how much it twists. Small wireless transmitter is connected to the strain gauge, strapped to the shaft, and sends the reading to his laptop. So by measuring the diameter of the shaft, and the how fast it rotates it's simple to calculate the power that goes through the shaft based on the reading from his gear.Where you notice this particularly is in long extension stacks. If you combine several extensions, not only do you have a lot of takeup from slop in the joints, but the windup can be significant before you get to full torque. But, it's hard to sell that idea here. I've been ridiculed for stating that before.
The best example of this is torque sticks. When you reach a certain torque, they twist as much as the impact turns, so that you essentially don't transfer any torque. Just absorb the energy in the extension without transferring any to the bolt. Every extension does this to some extent, whether it's noticeable or not is a question that probably varies by the cross section of the extension and the properties of the steel. I'm sure the same happens with sockets. But, I suspect the fit of the socket, both on the bolt and on the extension or ratchet has more to do with it than the steel properties.
In applying engineering principles, always remember the model assumptions. Failures happen when the actual real world item doesn't meet the ideal model assumptions.
Snap On sockets hit closer to the corners than other brands. You will also find that the contact patch is super thin.
That means less force is applied to the nut for a given torque.
That's less force to deform the socket elastically. Ditto the steel is harder, the extensions are also harder and wind less.
Difference in the force you apply to the ratchet handle could be significant.
Flank drive makes contact away from the corners, not closer, and s supposed to give a larger contact area.
Larger contact area means less pressure, not less total force. You actually have a tiny bit more force applied at the fastener head for a given torque, since the radius is a bit smaller. The difference is only a few percent, though.
The total energy lost in the deformation is trivial—you'd have to bend it a significant amount, at least 5-10 degrees, before it would be noticeable. That won't happen without a long extension, in which case the socket is irrelevant. If the socket was actually flexing to any significant extent the chrome would flake off.
No, the force at the handle is just the torque at the threads divided by the radius from your hand on the ratchet to the center of rotation. The wrench, socket, and fastener are a rigid body system once the slack is taken out.
The only thing that makes a real difference is a longer handle, and that doesn't change the torque needed to break the threads loose, but just the amount of force needed to generate that torque.
The torque will be the same.The actual torque is different with a different socket? We can agree that 20cfm of air for an impact that has 25 ft of 3/8 hose going to it has less resistance thru 25 ft of 3/4 black pipe before the regulator than 1/2. Would a human operator ever be able to tell.? How about this, takes 10# to tighten a nut with a Sears socket, how much does it take with a Snap? How about a 6 pt vs a 12? Different torque or energy required? What if it was a Williams vs a Sears?
Nope. Think about how torque sticks work. Every tool in your box is a torque stick. Just a matter of how much.
