BrandoJames
Well-known member
Here’s AvE’s tool battery review. I’m a bit disappointed that he didn’t tear everything apart, which is usually his SOP.
Below is a glossary of AvE slang terms for the uninitiated:
DeWilt = DeWalt
Strap-on = Snap-on
**** Wagon = Snap-on truck
Milfuckee = Milwaukee
Borsch = Bosch
Cryobi = Ryobi
Hazard Frought = Harbor Freight
All of this eventually turned me off of the channel. I found the silliness and "shtick" to take up far too much time vs. the actual information produced. "Signal to Noise Ratio" comes to mind.
Perhaps the fault is mine, as I find being informed as being entertained. I don't need any add-ons.
Project Farm did a recent comparo like this.
All of this eventually turned me off of the channel. I found the silliness and "shtick" to take up far too much time vs. the actual information produced. "Signal to Noise Ratio" comes to mind.
Perhaps the fault is mine, as I find being informed as being entertained. I don't need any add-ons.
Yep...AvE does mention that, lol.
The problem with Project Farm is the focus on trivial differences, e.g. “Brand A lasted 30 seconds longer than Brand B !!!”.
The PF host reminds me of a 6th grader at the science fair.
All of this eventually turned me off of the channel. I found the silliness and "shtick" to take up far too much time vs. the actual information produced. "Signal to Noise Ratio" comes to mind.
Perhaps the fault is mine, as I find being informed as being entertained. I don't need any add-ons.
Not all trivial. He's bought the knock-off batteries that are all over Amazon and almost all of them have been 1/2 to 2/3 of their labeled capacity. Project farm is good for just being straight forward and relatable. AvE in the same test would have some stupid rube goldberg rig and a rigol scope involved.
AvE doesnt know what he's talking about most of the time and has always rambled about trivialities like the amount of glass fiber in a plastic housing where most consumers wont know or care. Anyone with google and enough time to waste could of started the same channel. He breaks most of the things he takes apart. People come back for the dialogue and laughs. I lost interest and stopped watching quite some time ago.
All of this eventually turned me off of the channel. I found the silliness and "shtick" to take up far too much time vs. the actual information produced. "Signal to Noise Ratio" comes to mind.
Perhaps the fault is mine, as I find being informed as being entertained. I don't need any add-ons.
Yep...AvE does mention that, lol.
The problem with Project Farm is the focus on trivial differences, e.g. “Brand A lasted 30 seconds longer than Brand B !!!”.
The PF host reminds me of a 6th grader at the science fair.
All of this eventually turned me off of the channel. I found the silliness and "shtick" to take up far too much time vs. the actual information produced. "Signal to Noise Ratio" comes to mind.
Perhaps the fault is mine, as I find being informed as being entertained. I don't need any add-ons.

Love his videos...I like the fact he tears **** apart so I don't have to to see the guts/internals of consumer products.
No one is saying they can do better. They're saying his childish "hur hur funny words" shtick got way over the top annoying. It got real old, real fast. AvE 3 years ago had a great mix of actual content sprinkled with humor and hubris. Now he's just cocky and babbles incoherently for 10 minutes in each video. When 3/4 of what should be his core audience on this forum says he ***** now - there's a problem with his content.I love hearing people decry content producers. Anyone can do what he's doing! I could do what he did in that video and do it a whole lot better! I can make better content! Then ******* do it then. Stop whining on the internet and being all-negative
Not really. There's a lot of flash to his teardowns, but little substance. He makes a lot of confident-sounding assumptions about the build quality based on appearances, but never actually uses the tool in a way it's meant to be used.Exactly right. AvE's teardowns are way more informative than any other tool review channel.
all of the major brands do serious engineering to make sure their tools will last.
Ah yes, ranking batteries based on very little actual use and only based on what he "sees" when taking them apart. Real scientific there.
I've seen enough failed Snap-On batteries to know they ain't very good. I also know enough people using the DeWalt 20v and 60v batteries in very harsh commercial construction environments to know that they hold up fine. I agree with the Makita's chip being a big load 'o BS, but the batteries hold up fine otherwise.
No one is saying they can do better. They're saying his childish "hur hur funny words" shtick got way over the top annoying. It got real old, real fast. AvE 3 years ago had a great mix of actual content sprinkled with humor and hubris. Now he's just cocky and babbles incoherently for 10 minutes in each video. When 3/4 of what should be his core audience on this forum says he ***** now - there's a problem with his content.
Not really. There's a lot of flash to his teardowns, but little substance. He makes a lot of confident-sounding assumptions about the build quality based on appearances, but never actually uses the tool in a way it's meant to be used.
Things I care about in a tool: Ergonomics, power/performance, usability, durability, battery life/efficiency.
Things I don't really care about: Whether or not AvE "thinks" the gearbox is "skookum". Yeah, you can get some sense of the tool's "quality" through a visual teardown, but all of the major brands do serious engineering to make sure their tools will last.

Silly me thinking the people who participate in a forum that focuses on shop, tool, and manufacturing topics would be the target audience of a channel that started out being about shop, tool and manufacturing topicsWhat makes you think the members of Garage Journal "should" be his core audience?![]()

I wish project farm did more statistical analysis of his tests. Testing 1 drill bit once during a test is fairly meaningless when, say, the difference is 30 seconds from test X. You need at least 3 data points to make a confidence interval and then he can apply the Tukey HSD/connecting letters to see if there is a statistically significant difference between the things hes comparing.
Using drill bits as an example... yes I see X drill bit drilled 30 seconds longer than Y drill bit. However, how do we know that you got a really good X drill bit and a crappy Y drill bit from process variation.
Do all the ugly work behind the scenes. You don't need to record you toasting drill bits for hours. Just say I tested X-number of drill bits and here are the results averaged out.Yes...lets make a painfully boring 15 minutes into a 90 minute snoozefest.
Do all the ugly work behind the scenes. You don't need to record you toasting drill bits for hours. Just say I texted X-number of drill bits and here are the results averaged out.
Silly me thinking the people who participate in a forum that focuses on shop, tool, and manufacturing topics would be the target audience of a channel that started out being about shop, tool and manufacturing topics![]()
