General question about the subject, if you don't box the entire frame, have you gained anything?
I see guys who only box parts of it, and wonder if that doesn't just transfer the stress to those areas that aren't boxed?
In a "C" section frame rail, the horizontal top and bottom sections carry the load. The vertical web is a truss member. It's OK to put holes and brackets in the web, but not in the top or bottom. It drives me nuts to see someone drilling or notching the top or bottom rail because it weakens the frame at that point.

I don't see frame boxing as "adding" any strength in the big picture...as mentioned, unless you box the WHOLE thing, still gonna be a weak link somewhere. If you need a super strong frame, probably best to just build one from scratch using rectangle tubing...
Frame boxing to me is just as mentioned, to be able to mount different engines, make a section stronger due to customization like a C-Notch or different suspension...
Ive seen many hacked up frame mods over the years,what really irritates me is some of butchered /half assed sub frame jobs ive seen where people obviously couldn't use a tape measure or square.
And whats even worse is the bubble gum welding and verticle welds on frame pieces that should never of been done that way!
If I had a dollar for every crooked *** nova/camaro sub Ive had to cut off/redo over the years ,or every model A frame Ive had to unbox and straighten out before reboxing it because some idiot didn't have the brains to run a tape measure and level before boxing it to make sure it was straight,or he wasn't smart enough to have it mounted to a solid/level surface when boxing it and to check for square during the boxing process.
Don't get me started!![]()
Are you going to leave the truck a dually? Ive done the cross member/suspension swap from a mid 70s chevy 1 ton on to a 1950 chevy/gmc frame back in the days ,it came out looking like it rolled off the assembly line but took some narrowing of cross member and some really good welding and some grinding/buffing to hide that what work was done.
Before you get too carried away measure the outside width on the front tires to get a general idea if theyre close,then measure the frame widths where the cross member will be going to see if its going to throw you off.
Ive got a chevy 3/4 front stub sitting down by the barn still I think,I can measure it for you Friday/sat when Im back down there again if you want.
If you decide to leave the truck a dually Id check and see if you can mount rotors from a 1t dually on to the 3/4t spindles,Or you might be able to see if you can unbolt the old dually extensions from the old ford drums if they were 8 lug bolted to the drum.
Can you post pictures of the ford drums/hubs?![]()
I have a Ford parts book for 1938-46, and the wheels look to be 6 lugs either 17 or 18 inch, and they are three piece split ring.
I have a Ford parts book for 1938-46, and the wheels look to be 6 lugs either 17 or 18 inch, and they are three piece split ring.
you may have a book but I have real trucks and your book is wrong. The wheels are 5 lug and 20"
No. 3/4 ton rear end. The og "banjo" rear end has got to go so I can drive on interstates safely and new brakes vs old.
My welding skills are ok as are my metal skills, so I'm ok there.
cool. Don't put yourself out on getting it measured, I don't have the donor truck yet. It's been raining and the guy can't get it out of his pasture yet. But in a few weeks I should have it. I have the ford right here.
Pics coming. it may be tomorrow tho, I don't have cell service out here to upload to photo bucket.........On second thought, I may have one stashed.
good looking truck. could you just mount the body on a complete chev frame and suspension? you would good to go with brakes, etc. also the motor if you don't want to run the flattie, altho I think the flat head would be killer looking!
jim
Are you going to make a 3/4-1t dually out of it or are you just going with single wheels?
That would make a cool 1 ton dually truck.![]()