So I have a question for all you guys that suggest raising the building. Just how are you planning on dealing with the cold joint and anchorage. Oh you bet this is a rhetorical question but I'd like to someone post a feasible answer.
So I have a question for all you guys that suggest raising the building. Just how are you planning on dealing with the cold joint and anchorage. Oh you bet this is a rhetorical question but I'd like to someone post a feasible answer.
Cold Joint? It is a CMU wall, not cast in place concrete. I'm not an expert, but I don't know of any issues adding on to CMU block. Anchor it the same way you would have to the existing CMU block. If there is threaded rod cast into solid cores in the existing CMU block, drill and epoxy new threaded rods in to extend them as needed.
And since this is GJ, how many people are thinking "I sure hope this guy has another tall garage with a lift.... because who builds a new garage that cant fit one????
![]()
The strength of CMU construction is not the block, it's the grout. Type one construction is typical across the board to a greater extent. It doesn't make much difference if you use forms for cast in place concrete or grout in-fill of the CMU. Unless you do just exactly as you stated by epoxing in the reinforcement as well as the anchorage it'll be a disaster waiting to happen.
So point being what would be the most effective means of remediation. Doing that ^^^ or lowering the slab and dealing with maybe some external methods of channeling water shed.
The contractor wasn't detailed enough to catch the elevation mistake for the framing. You really think he'd have the capabilities to perform raising the building another course or two?. I have an extensive backround in type one construction and all though it can be done, it would not be my first choice in this instance.
Also it seems the OP's real problem was the header height. There's been some good info with how to change that elevation. In my opinion big deal if the contractor has to rip the front of the building apart and redo it. If lowering the slab isn't a viable option this would be my next choice. But if the ceiling height also kills the deal well then there's only two choices.
Do NOT settle for something less than what you contracted for! 10 years from now you will still be regretting it. If it were me, I would tell them to tear it down and start over. If he is a legit contractor, he should have insurance to cover the cost for the error. If he doesn't I would contact a lawyer to make sure your **** is covered before agreeing to any settlement. No amount of discount would make me happy. It's either right or it's not.
I may come off to some as being a **** about it but we had a fairly large addition done on our house and garage 12 years ago and now dealing with foundation settling issues that may require up to $15k worth of helical piers. When the contractor was doing the foundation work, I questioned their technique and was assured that we would have no problems. I should have insisted on it being done right at the time and now paying for a poor decision. Live and learn.
The strength of CMU construction is not the block, it's the grout. Type one construction is typical across the board to a greater extent. It doesn't make much difference if you use forms for cast in place concrete or grout in-fill of the CMU. Unless you do just exactly as you stated by epoxing in the reinforcement as well as the anchorage it'll be a disaster waiting to happen.
So point being what would be the most effective means of remediation. Doing that ^^^ or lowering the slab and dealing with maybe some external methods of channeling water shed.
The contractor wasn't detailed enough to catch the elevation mistake for the framing. You really think he'd have the capabilities to perform raising the building another course or two?. I have an extensive backround in type one construction and all though it can be done, it would not be my first choice in this instance.
Also it seems the OP's real problem was the header height. There's been some good info with how to change that elevation. In my opinion big deal if the contractor has to rip the front of the building apart and redo it. If lowering the slab isn't a viable option this would be my next choice. But if the ceiling height also kills the deal well then there's only two choices.
How does this increase the ceiling/wall height inside the building??
Do NOT settle for something less than what you contracted for! 10 years from now you will still be regretting it.
Jack up the building and put another course of block under it??
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
This. For free. Or build to original spec as it was not in the first place and shouldn't get a CO if it wasn't...
Tommy
...have him tear it down or sell it to a neighbor (move it), and then re-build per the contract...
If the contract/plans actually showed this I think we would see it posted. It's easy to say "Builder screwed up." Rather doubtful the builder will tear it down.
Builder has agreed verbally that it's not to spec and is working with their engineers to raise the door opening to the spec.
Plans definitely agree with the specifications, no one is disputing that.
If the contract/plans actually showed this I think we would see it posted. It's easy to say "Builder screwed up." Rather doubtful the builder will tear it down.


This right here!!!
8 years ago when I built my house my builder did this to my attached over under Garage. I wanted both to have 8 foot high doors and 10 feet clear. The upstairs Garage is 10' 6" and the lower is 9' 6".
Seeing your post my blood started boiling. I kick myself every time I go to the lower Garage and I cannot use the custom built Garage Door opener and I have to get out of whatever I am driving and have to open that F'ed up door. They could not get the springs and opener working together due to the twin track door...I just mother F'ed that door last night again when I went to shovel and had to go inside and manually open it.
I wish the building industry would adapt a quality control process.
You are all a wealth of knowledge, thank you. I've let the builder know it's up to them to make it right, fix it or provide enough money for me to have it done by qualified contractors. The building contractor told me they are not qualified to raise the building, and they don't do concrete.
I'm so jealous of you who live in communities that allow 12' and greater walls, we can only do 9' from grade. That means 4" max from where it is now.
Cement, foundation and block are a different contractor. It's a 42 x 12 foundation, with CMU above that. With a 13" slope from side to side, the foundation top is below grade on the high side and above on the low. Pad will come nearly to the top of the lower block if it's sloped to the driveway and be 1-2" above grade at the garage door. That seems like the minimum above grade to avoid water.
We decided having a full 6' 8" attic was more important than a lift, especially for the truck. I don't think I'll be raising the roof in 1-2 years, maybe asking about how to redo the truss bottom chord [emoji3], outside height is the maximum we can do already, unless it's attached to the house. Hmmmm…
Putting in a shorter header also means less room for garage door springs. There are rear spring mounts and low headroom tracks adding more costs to deal with the screwup.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It's 81.75" from top of CMU to header opening, and your right there is room for a 7' door.
We could regrade the yard side and when I asked the inspector about where to measure from said they weren't worried about an inch or so.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
As to those who suggest raising the building and laying another course under it, I can tell you from experience it's not nearly as easy as it looks, and you have to be careful in detailing the connection from the existing wall to the bottom plate. You have to rely on more than gravity to keep the building in place. If I were the HO, I would probably want this detail done by a structural engineer.
Whats up with that first course of shingles? Looks like there is a drip edge peeking thru? Shouldnt see that, I dont think.
Not sure what the roof should do at that pitch change, looks like they just nailed it down from the surface?
Maybe someone can comment that knows roofing better
Tell him the only reason you built was to work on truck so it has 0 use to you know.
Demo and rebuild or return 50% of the money.
I can't see a reason why you can't pour the floor 8-8.5" below the top of the block wall. You're going to have to dig back aways into the soil to re-direct the waterflow around the concrete apron, but's it's not that big of a deal in reality.
The 6" block, its 6" square, right?
I can help with that. To answer your question, both are improper installation. You should never see the drip edge thru the first course of shingles. There should be a starter course under the first coarse of shingle. Now there is a potential blow off scenario.
On the transition, the steep angle shingles usually end at the transition, then a piece of metal flashing is installed, and then a new starter course and then shingles again. You can also do the transition without the metal flashing if you lay the shingles out the right way. Either is acceptable.
Finished dimensions, as mortared, for the block is 8" x 8" x 16".
Finished dimensions, as mortared, for the cap block is 4" x 8" x 16".
And another row of block, and a row of cap block, you'll have your as specified 12" height.
6/8 block is very common.
