Just another way to get us to spend more money on things that are utterly useless. They subsidize LEDs and sell them for $1 each at the dollar store, then go and mandate fixtures that they don't work in because the base is different. All in the name of getting people to use less electricity and save money.
You know not what what you talk about......but then again, you live in tweakerville.
Title 24 is actually a pretty good rule.....
Considering how the population in this state is growing....the cost to support more electrical needs is far greater than just getting people to use less.
Until recently, lighting accounted for about 30% of the electrical use in a typical home. Lighting is one of the easiest ways to reduce that electrical load.
I'm at a loss as to why the resistance to new lighting. I have ONE incandescent bulb in my house. ONE.....it's in the oven. My average electric bill is about $40/month. And no one in my house knows how to turn off a light. Most of the rooms have occupancy sensors...including the main hallway.
About half my fixtures have Edison sockets....but I'm in compliance because I have the occupancy sensors. Eventually I'll replace the Edison with a GU24 socket. The can lights I have make it easy to swap out the base.
I like the fact I no longer have to stock bulbs. The only spare bulbs I have are a couple of LED bulbs with miniature bases (chandelier type). My garage has 18 CFL's in it. In 6 years, I've replaced one. And it was actually a used one from many years before. Garage door opener has LED's now...because I couldn't get an incandescent to last more than 6 months in it.
Title 24 is one of those things that forces a good thing on people....but once you realize it is good....then life is good.