I've recently been doing a bunch of research into crimping for a couple projects, and after days of research finally settled on some ratcheting crimpers for smaller wire, but now I'm struggling to decide on what to get for larger wire. The problem is I don't see myself using them very often at all, as I primarily am just looking to build a custom set of jumper cables with some welding cable and quick disconnects, but I also don't want to spend the time and money on doing it only to have the crimps be done half-cocked. It would be a much easier choice if the crimpers were something I'd use regularly, as then I could justify the money on a quality set like the FTZs, but since they'll likely be used once then sit unused for who knows how long, only to be used on very rare occasions, I just can't get myself to spend that kind of money.
One thing I've noticed is that the FTZ and AMP crimpers that RC (Maine Sail) recommends in his
pbase article (also linked above) both do square / diamond crimps, whereas all the cheaper ones I've seen, both hydraulic and compound action bolt-cutter style, do hexagon crimps. I wouldn't think there would be a difference, but according to
this article, it appears hexagonal crimps may actually be the worst type, as they aren't gas-tight. It's the only source I've been able to find that discusses the differences between the various crimp types, so I'd love if someone could provide more info on this, either in the form of other links or their own knowledge.
I started out considering just a hammer crimper based on watching
this video where they used one, thinking if they used it then it must be good. But then in reading various threads I found that while a lot of people like them and think they work well, a lot of people don't think they work well, including RC in his article. So I was then considering one of the TEMCo crimpers, especially the
TH0012 dieless one, though possibly the
TH0020, until I saw
his post about them being nothing but rebranded Chinese import crimpers with a markup for the name and warranty (which confirms OP's concerns from his first post).
I don't really want hydraulic crimpers since I won't be using them much, so the cost and risk of failure due to leaking isn't worth it. I like the idea of the TEMCo dieless ones, since they're not hydraulic and are reasonably priced, but now I'm questioning just how good that crimp type actually is, and I really don't like the idea of overpaying for rebranded stuff, especially when the company is misleading about it. I'm also not fond of how difficult the cable-cutter style are to use (needing three hands), but I'd be willing to deal with it, especially since I wouldn't be doing a ton of crimps, if the crimp quality I'd get is really that much better. But then, I'm left trying to figure out if the hexagonal crimps made by the cheaper versions really are inferior to the square/diamond ones done by the more expensive ones (and the same goes for the hydraulic ones as well), so that seems to be the biggest question I'm left with at this point.
I'm also curious if there's a difference between double thin crimps done by the FTZ crimper and single wide crimps done by crimpers like the HF. Also, slightly OT, but I wonder if rotating the crimp 90 degrees and doing it again like he does in the pbase article might actually weaken the cold weld and, as a result, the crimp itself.