I'm so glad to learn this. Boys we only need a 1/2 hp compressor and put a really big end on the pipe...
Chris
Some of what you have said in your posts here is leaning toward reality, some is really close to fantasy. You really need to do some research on this subject.
To the OP, Nehog has about the simplist correct answer. If you keep plugging small compressors into the piping system you will continue to get more air volume. If you burn out the compressors you will understand why so many warnings of duty cycle. What tool are you trying to run that is taxing your system? Do you have a piping system or just a hose from the compressor? What size hose and fittings are you using?
I have in my younger years had 3 compressors all connected to the system for some high use jobs. Neat thing is that 2 portables are quick attach and quick to move out of the shop to some remote job. You have no worry if your compressors are not matched. They only care what their pressure switch tells them to do. You only really have to worry if your electrical is able to handle the load. I always set the large compressor to come on first and if it doesn't keep up then the second and third kick in.. Tank size is also perty much out of the picture. Once the compressor kicks in the tank is out of the picture.
Think of the tank like the battery in your car. It only needs to start the engine, once started the alternator drives the electrical load. If you upgrade to a meggawatt music system you will soon find that your battery goes dead driving down the road. The idiot will go get a big battery and finds out he can only drive a bit longer till the battery goes dead. The informed get a bigger alternator to carry the increased load. Think of the alternator as your pump(s) and the tank size as your battery.
lg
no neat sig line
You understand that I've built, from scratch, a half dozen compressor systems?
Posted my first Frankenpressor, under that heading some years ago.
You don't seem to understand what I am saying, so you assume I don't understand how they work.
Um, yes, I do.
You are kind of missing what the OP said, and what I was replying to.
He, not I, said he needed more air volume than his ? horsepower compressor can sustain.
He, not I, said that he needed more volume than two 60 gallon tanks could supply.
Now I have no clue what he's doing that a common, say 5 horsepower, compressor with 120 gallons of reserve can't handle, as we have run a paint booth with two guns running with less, but heck, who knows what he is doing.
It doesn't matter, if that's what he wants.
Duty cycles are what I was discussing. You are familiar with those, right?
If he is indeed, gobbling 10.4 plus cubic feet of air, over enough time that 120 gallons of reserve can't allow his ? horsepower compressor to keep up, then he needs something that will supply 10.4 plus cubic feet of air 'indefinitely' .
This is not my opinion, it's the posted desire.
And the cheap compressors, (he specified the price) are not designed to do that, even in tandem, at least, for a decent interval of time.
Despite which, the question was about economics, not hardware, or how to do it.
It was a feasibility question.
i.e. Is this a good idea? Invest one compressor (already owned) add another compressor (to be purchased) plus wiring, plumbing, design (to be purchased) to attain a goal more economically solved for less money by buying a purpose built unit, and recovering some investment from the other already owned unit.
Or is that all way too 'fantasy'?
