I mentioned to an Electrical Engineer about the 2-2-4-6, he wondered why you would undersize the Neutral that much?
Any insight?
Cost savings, easier to work with, easier to pull in conduit, more common if your using an underground cable (URD/MHF) rather than individual conductors. Extremely unlikely to cause any problems now or if you add loads in the future.
Sizing the neutral 2 sizes smaller than the line is pretty commonly accepted for services and many feeders. You will have 240V loads that do not even use a neutral and many of the 120v loads will be on opposite phases and the difference in neutral currents cancel.
A smaller neutral yet can be permitted, as small as a #8 copper or #6 aluminum for a 100A feeder, but you would have to do some extra calculations to determine it was OK. This is a bit extreme unless you have almost exclusively 240v loads and no plans to change that.
From my limited experience many electrical engineers spec whatever sound good on paper and do not even consider cost as a factor. Most jobs get the same "boiler plate" set of spec's with minimal consideration to the situation at hand. Obviously cost is a concern to most on here and we try to cut them in many ways while still ending up with a safe, functional, and durable end result.
I'm sure many of them would spec this project with copper and maybe even an UPsized neutral.I won't claim to be an expert but even if you have problems with harmonics any reason for an upsized neutral is a big load of BS.