I believe one of the reasons Cman wrenches get bashed on this site is because they don't say "Snap On" on them. I've owned Cman raised panels for 40 years, and have multiple sets for the shop, trucks, and tractors. Some sets are older, some sets are newer. There's a big difference in beam width between the older and newer, with the newer ones being wider. I cannot remember ever breaking one, but I don't abuse tools either.
I also own several other wrench sets, including SO, SK, Barcalo, Cman professional, and MAC. Some posters said the Cmans are too short. My answer is, "It depends." Shorter wrenches require more effort to achieve the same torque. Of course, that means it's pretty easy to overtorque with a longer wrench. If you are not very strong, then maybe longer wrenches would give you an advantage. My wife likes the longer wrenches because it easier for her to break bolts loose.
Shorter wrenches can also be an advantage if the swing area is limited. There are some places a longer wrench just won't fit. As to feel, the raised panels (Cman, SK, Barcalo), all feel about the same to me. The fully polished (SO, Cman professional) are smoother, which is nice until they get oily. Then they can be pretty slippery. The MACs are smooth (no raised panel) but are not a shiny chrome finish. The beams are the narrowest of all my wrench sets and have a squarer edge profile. This can be an advantage in tight spaces.
As for the bling factor, there are two things that matter: First, the shinier the better. Second, the more they cost, the bigger the bragging rights. It has always been, no matter what product is being compared, whether it's wrenches, cars, or women.
As to Cman raised panels, I believe they are a good wrench at a good price. It's like going to McDonalds for a hamburger and fries. It may not be the fanciest meal, but it's a good value and you know what you are going to get every time.
Dale