To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

Delta 10” Saw Arbor Bearings

mcbane

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 23, 2017
Messages
794
Location
California
I replaced the arbor bearings in a 1986 34-444 saw and ran into a snag: the “load spring”, part 156 in the parts diagram rubs on the inner race of the new bearing. This appears to be due to the replacement bearings having slightly larger inner races than the OEM bearings, which just barely clear the springs.

The bright spots on the spring show where it rubs against the bearing inner race.

Does anyone know the purpose of the load spring? I’m wondering if I can just leave it out vs trying to modify it with a die grinder.
 

Attachments

  • CCEE23F7-5964-455B-AD11-8FFA51D7F5F3.jpeg
    CCEE23F7-5964-455B-AD11-8FFA51D7F5F3.jpeg
    164.5 KB · Views: 33
  • 43C5150C-B2A3-42BD-BD40-AD0CCDF2E709.jpeg
    43C5150C-B2A3-42BD-BD40-AD0CCDF2E709.jpeg
    195.7 KB · Views: 30
  • C01579AA-D791-43E1-9BCB-4097A956EC03.jpeg
    C01579AA-D791-43E1-9BCB-4097A956EC03.jpeg
    161.5 KB · Views: 30
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

seber

Well-known member
Joined
May 31, 2016
Messages
4,198
Location
Deep East Tx.
I suspect if you leave it out the blade will move laterally in use. Just do a minor relief on the peaks with a die grinder.
 

mikegt4

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 12, 2005
Messages
3,271
Location
sw ohio
I have the same saw of nearly the same vintage. My saw has never needed any repairs some I don't have experience there. I did restore a 1950 Delta 34-500 8" table saw last year and the bearing's inner race was offset, by design the inner race projected out on one side of the bearing but not the other. Your bearing might be the same. Here are a couple of links that might give you some hints.
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!
OP
M

mcbane

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 23, 2017
Messages
794
Location
California
I have the same saw of nearly the same vintage. My saw has never needed any repairs some I don't have experience there. I did restore a 1950 Delta 34-500 8" table saw last year and the bearing's inner race was offset, by design the inner race projected out on one side of the bearing but not the other. Your bearing might be the same. Here are a couple of links that might give you some hints.
Your second link is very interesting. My wavy spring washers are crushed flat and the sleeve spacer can still slide around. So either my “OEM” bearings or my spacer sleeve isn’t original. Maybe I need to shim the sleeve spacer to work with the bearings I have, in addition to grinding a bit of clearance in the wavy spring washers.
 

matt_i

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 14, 2008
Messages
10,728
Location
SE Michigan
If removing the wave washer gets you clearance after the nut is tightened then I'd go for it.

It looks like its a double layer although it could be a wound-helix. You could try cutting one wind of the helix off to get back to one layer. You could also work on setting up custom arbor shim(s). The wave washer allows for a range of manufacturing tolerances and temperatures to all be a net-build at assembly.
 

neophyte

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 23, 2012
Messages
9,700
Location
Pennsylvannia
A probable reason for the spring washer.

“Preloading a bearing provides constant contact between the bearing type (ball, needle, etc.) and bearing races. The sustained load provided by the spring eliminates axial and radial play, among other benefits. The overall goal of preloading is to prolong bearing life, and therefore, your application.”
 
OP
M

mcbane

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 23, 2017
Messages
794
Location
California
Thanks everyone for the help. I did the die grinder work on the wavy spring washer and machined a 2mm shim to put on the arbor shaft in addition to the too short shaft spacer. Got it back together today. Nothing rubs and the spring is about half way compressed with the arbor nut torqued down.
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!
Top Bottom