-Your recent post is different than the previous flat statement claiming
"This is the reason higher drilling speeds are recommended, because the drill bit will take less material per revolution at the higher speed."
-Higher RPM is supported by the drill material, not necessarily recommended. Cutting speed largely depends upon the material being cut as well as what the cutting tool itself is made of. Speed in RPM doesn't affect the amount of material being cut, the feed rate into the material does.
-Gee no kidding. Same feed rate at higher RPM cuts less material is a change in IPR (Inch Per Revolution). This is a more valid explanation than the first statement that increasing RPM alone will cut less material. Feed rate is also expressed as chip loading per tooth and a different, but related, topic for another time.
-Using router bits and drilling are not the same subtractive processes, even in plunge routing. The flute geometry, cutter material, and material being cut (if it's not metal) are nowhere near the same. The "anti-kickback" you reference limits the feed, not speed.
-This is a blatantly false statement, heat has a LOT to do with what occurs with almost all machine cutting methods. Speed generated heat, abrasion, and material (being cut) properties are what dull a cutting tool. Does work hardening mean anything to you?
-You're entitled to believe what you want but several of your posted statements are either misleading or just flat out wrong. This is not a personal attack on the OP. For those wanting to learn I would suggest not blindly accepting what either of us post, do your own research and decide for yourself. I've only been a professional toolmaker for 30+ years so what would I know?