To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

Feeder & switch wires in same conduit to detached building?

malibu101

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 1, 2005
Messages
3,910
Location
Walnutport PA
I know this has been asked before and after searching I must ask this simple question. I am helping a buddy plan and we are stumped on this.
It is not getting inspected but we want to insure that it is NEC code compliant if he were to sell the place and have it inspected.

100A subpanel feed from the house to a pole building. All in conduit and all properly sized.
He would like (2) 3-way switches at the garage door and the house door to operate exterior lights on both the garage and the house from each location.
Simple enough.

QUESTIONS-
1- Can the (8) #12 THHN run through the same conduit as the feeders to the garage? Conduit sized properly of course.
2- If so; Should they be fed from one structure or the other?
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

Norcal

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 16, 2008
Messages
13,796
Are the conductors tapped from the meter, or are they off the house panel? If yes to the first part, then absolutely not, but either way I would run another conduit.
 

theoldwizard1

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 22, 2011
Messages
43,674
Location
SE MI
Are the conductors tapped from the meter, or are they off the house panel? If yes to the first part, then absolutely not, but either way I would run another conduit.
I would NEVER tap directly off of a meter !

Second conduit is not required. Good question on where the "source" should be from.

You might consider some of the modern "wireless" 3 way switches. The remote one mounts on a wall in the house. It looks like a normal switch with a switch plate ! Battery powered.
 

Bert_

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 24, 2016
Messages
9,931
Location
NW Iowa
I would probably run another conduit. Another 3/4 - 1" PVC is cheap. Nothing wrong with running them in the same pipe though. Only thing to watch is that you might have to derate your wires if you have to many in one conduit.

Source should be the sub panel. That way there is only a single feed to the garage and either panel can de-energize the circuit since it would pass though both panels.
 
OP
M

malibu101

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 1, 2005
Messages
3,910
Location
Walnutport PA
I would probably run another conduit. Another 3/4 - 1" PVC is cheap. Nothing wrong with running them in the same pipe though. Only thing to watch is that you might have to derate your wires if you have to many in one conduit.

Source should be the sub panel. That way there is only a single feed to the garage and either panel can de-energize the circuit since it would pass though both panels.

Never thought of derating for the conductor count. Good catch!

Thanks all for the answer that it can be done.
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

teamextreme

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 10, 2013
Messages
867
Location
Lakewood, CO
I can't imagine you would have to count all 3-way switch travelers on a conductor count, seeing as only one per group would be energized at a time. Also not sure why you need 8 wires. Worst case I see is if you are planning on 2 pairs of 3 ways, each controlling an independent light on each end, then you'd need 6. If it's one pair of 3 ways controlling a commonly connected light on each end, then you'd only need 4.

And you need to source power from the pole barn to be legal.
 
OP
M

malibu101

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 1, 2005
Messages
3,910
Location
Walnutport PA
I can't imagine you would have to count all 3-way switch travelers on a conductor count, seeing as only one per group would be energized at a time. Also not sure why you need 8 wires. Worst case I see is if you are planning on 2 pairs of 3 ways, each controlling an independent light on each end, then you'd need 6. If it's one pair of 3 ways controlling a commonly connected light on each end, then you'd only need 4.

And you need to source power from the pole barn to be legal.
Both lights can be on at the same time if wished.
We just figured to pull the ground wires for the (2) switch circuits along with the travellers. Just like using (2) 12/3 NM cables. ;)
So yes, we could get away with only 6 wires between the buildings IF we use the ground of each building on each end.

Thanks!
 

Dirtydan69

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 8, 2015
Messages
847
Location
San Tan Valley, AZ
I would NEVER tap directly off of a meter !

Second conduit is not required. Good question on where the "source" should be from.

You might consider some of the modern "wireless" 3 way switches. The remote one mounts on a wall in the house. It looks like a normal switch with a switch plate ! Battery powered.

I have one of those in my house. Slight delay but works as it should.
 

wyliesdiesels

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 14, 2012
Messages
20,279
Location
Modesto, CA
I would NEVER tap directly off of a meter!

Second conduit is not required. Good question on where the "source" should be from.


You might consider some of the modern "wireless" 3 way switches. The remote one mounts on a wall in the house. It looks like a normal switch with a switch plate ! Battery powered.

I wouldnt either but its done quite often...

And yeah he could run UF-b...

I can't imagine you would have to count all 3-way switch travelers on a conductor count, seeing as only one per group would be energized at a time. Also not sure why you need 8 wires. Worst case I see is if you are planning on 2 pairs of 3 ways, each controlling an independent light on each end, then you'd need 6. If it's one pair of 3 ways controlling a commonly connected light on each end, then you'd only need 4.

And you need to source power from the pole barn to be legal.

Actually, it would be 2 per group because one traveller and the wire on the common screw would be energized all the time on the source switches and energized when the light is on, on the load switches.

Code however, says to count the current carrying conductors so would be 6. I would have to look and see if theres any exceptions for 3 way lighting circuits.
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!
Top Bottom