MattRMagnum
Well-known member
Hey Folks,
Long time, no talk. After a wonderful run around with the county, I wound up giving up on building a garage on my previous property*, and moved to a house that came with a 30x36 garage. I've run into a problem, though: it has a grease pit. When I first bought it, I thought I'd love having one. Thanks to the water table, it's basically a nasty swimming pool that eats sump pumps.
I've decided, in light of that, to have it filled in. Has anyone done this before? I'm worried simply filling it with cement might cause the building to sink or tilt a little (where as, at present, it's fairly level). The only other idea I could come up with would be having it packed with dirt (and I mean packed, not just filled), and then lay a cement lid across it.
* There's a creek (1' wide by 3-4" deep for most of the year) that runs beside ~85% of the property. The county told me that it's considered protected, and there's a 150' set back for new construction on either side... which is wider than the property is. Only way I could've built would be by proving that the remaining 15% was completely unbuildable. Rather than building there (it would've required tearing out a lot of beautiful old growth trees), I moved.
Long time, no talk. After a wonderful run around with the county, I wound up giving up on building a garage on my previous property*, and moved to a house that came with a 30x36 garage. I've run into a problem, though: it has a grease pit. When I first bought it, I thought I'd love having one. Thanks to the water table, it's basically a nasty swimming pool that eats sump pumps.
I've decided, in light of that, to have it filled in. Has anyone done this before? I'm worried simply filling it with cement might cause the building to sink or tilt a little (where as, at present, it's fairly level). The only other idea I could come up with would be having it packed with dirt (and I mean packed, not just filled), and then lay a cement lid across it.
* There's a creek (1' wide by 3-4" deep for most of the year) that runs beside ~85% of the property. The county told me that it's considered protected, and there's a 150' set back for new construction on either side... which is wider than the property is. Only way I could've built would be by proving that the remaining 15% was completely unbuildable. Rather than building there (it would've required tearing out a lot of beautiful old growth trees), I moved.
