LawnBoy-5247,
I tried to send you a private message, but it doesn't look like it went through for some reason? If you didn't receive a PM from me, can you please send me a PM? It's about the Fluke 189 at the pawn shop (I'm also in KC).
All,
I've been using Fluke meters for around 25-30 years now.... Everything from an old Fluke 23, on up to a Fluke 1750, and lots of stuff in between. I recently replaced my 189 with a 289, which is essentially the newer version of the 189. I can't remember when I bought the 189, but I used if for a few years +/-. It spent most of it's life banging around inside my tool bag in the back of my pickup, and was used regularly in some pretty harsh industrial environments all over the Midwest. Over the years it saw huge temperature extremes, occasional drops and bumps, etc. It was very durable considering the abuse it received.
All of my test equipment is calibrated annually. My 189 failed the last calibration slightly after maybe 4-5 years (?) of heavy use. Also, there was a problem with the battery holder which caused it to shut off sometimes when the battery became disconnected. It also went through batteries faster than my other meters like the Fluke 87. Despite these issues, I'd say it was an excellent meter and never let me down in the field.
The only feature the 189 lacked that I would have liked to have is the low impedance mode (LoZ). I kept an old Simpson 260 around for those rare situations when a lower impedance was needed. This isn't a big deal unless you're trying to measure voltage on longer wires that are run alongside other energized wires - like a bundle of wires in the same conduit.
Anyway, I think the 189 is a great meter, but might be overkill depending on what you're wanting to do. I don't think you can go wrong with any of the Fluke products. I don' t keep track of the used prices, so I can't really comment on that. Mine was around $400 new if I remember correctly. I think that was for the combo kit which included extra accessories.