7th Kahuna
Well-known member
I don't know why companies what to buy up lesser quality. I know they are try to fit all price ranges. Instead of building one good product they play games.
Easy, it's all about stock price. In the past we valued innovation, quality, and market share. Today we only value profits. Look at Apple. They just released the iPhone 5 to record sales. They are an industry leader known for quality. What did their stock price do this week? It sunk.
So how does a company generate profits in a down economy? Cost savings. Buy a competitor and eliminate overlapping functions, contract out production and reduce overhead. Stockholders don't care if 'XYZ Company' produces a quality tool or even produces the tool at all. If the stock price starts to sink they will just get out, but in the mean time the stock is paying. Every consideration is short term.
Last year when Kodak announced they were all but shutting down operations, I heard a lot of smart people ask how it was that the industry leader had failed so miserably to adapt to the changing market. I heard smart people condemning the Kodak management, but I remember 20 years ago when the stock holders voted to stop management from investing any more money into digital. Money invested into development was money that wasn't available for the annual dividend. The stockholders, not management, made the decision to sacrifice the future in favor of short term profits. Few are aware that Kodak holds many of the early digital patents.
Today the most profitable companies seem to be big conglomerates that easily move in and out of business sectors. They do not innovate, they do not manufacture. Instead they steal capital from the past (buy buying up existing companies or copying their ideas) and then license or outsource production to generalist firms who, for example, produce for Levi's one week and for Walmart the next.
Levi's are a great example. When Levi's were made in the USA in Levi's plants, the design was well protected. Anyone remember the lawsuits in the 80's? Now Levi's doesn't seem to care that the rivets and pocket stitching are copied by a dozen other private labels all undoubtedly produced by the same generalist manufacturer overseas. I'm looking at a pair of Northeast Outfitters (Kmart) and if I changed the label I doubt you could tell the difference. This tells me that the companies themselves don't consider the product to be as valuable as the profits.
As consumers, we have all but lost influence. I suspect part of Craftsman's problem is they tried to play by the old rules for too long. Someone mentioned Sears' old 'good - better - best' model. They needed to have adapted that to today's tool market a long time ago. They needed to have created new rules and developed new suppliers years ago. Now it appears that maintaining a good selection of USA made quality tools at a reasonable (workable) price point is going to be difficult. Worse yet, they are going to have to figure that out even before they can try to repair their reputation.
I wish them all sorts of luck.


