My vote is for Hardi-plank. It's a definate step up from vinyl and also adds some fire resistance. If you're installing it yourself then your only concern is material cost. It's not a big cost increase when you take out the labor price.
Hardiplank still has to be painted though, right? Anything the size of a house that has to be painted occassionally is high maintainence IMO. Personally nothing beats vinyl when it comes to bang for buck.
Hardiplank still has to be painted though, right? Anything the size of a house that has to be painted occassionally is high maintainence IMO. Personally nothing beats vinyl when it comes to bang for buck.
My Hardiplank siding is primed, and I am not going to paint it until this summer. I would have likely picked the pre-painted stuff, but it wasn't available until after I had installed the other.
Depending on how you define "bang for buck", brick can be a winner as well (fire resistance, insulation, non-paint, resale value).
Brick is great but most houses now set the brick against a stick frame. Combine this with minimal overhangs and there is a likelihood of getting rot, etc. especially if the installer doesn't do a good job. Also brick is a lot more expensive than vinyl.
I like most of the James Hardy Co. siding producs. You can do so many creative things with them. OK it may need painting someday; however in 10 to 20 years I'm tired of the old color and welcome a fresh look.
I really don't think any siding is truly maintenance free. We had a brick building, actually a steel skeleton with solid brick walls, that required Thompson water seal treatment every few years otherwise the rain started to wick through the brick or mortar.