slipjointed
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 31, 2011
- Messages
- 665
Over the years I've heard my good share of comments, and more recently read my share of message-board comments regarding the pressure that is put on tradesmen of all types to own certain brands of tools.
The other night I was showing my new Wright stuff to a friend that is an auto mechanic. His first response was, "I've never heard of them", but after handling the tools and an explanation from me of Wright's history of a company as well as their company mission, he admitted that the tools were, in fact, very nice. That's a bit besides the point. This thread isn't really about any specific brand.
What he said afterwards though, was what intruiged me, that, "I would love to have some of that in my box, but I wouldn't be able to get a job anywhere". I asked him what he meant, and he said that if he didn't have Snap-on tools, he couldn't get hired as a mechanic at any good shops.
I was really surprised, because I've always known that there is the "tool status" issue, as with many other aspects of life, but I never thought it was to the point where owning (or not owning) a certain brand of tool could directly have an effect on one's employability. He seemed dead serious about it too, so I have to assume that he either was told this by someone he trusted, or had actually experienced it himself.
I've personally experienced it to a lesser degree, where I was working a job, and the supervisor for that job (thank god it was an outside contract and I never had to work for him again) refused to let me do a calibration on some equipment because I was using my Tenma multimeter, and in his words, "Fluke is the only company that makes good meters, I don't see how you can expect to do good work with that no-name piece of ****".
That isn't the first time I've experienced something like that for refusing to pay a 400% inflated price for a Chinese made multimeter stamped "Designed in USA". Fluke still makes decent meters, but frankly there's no difference between them and myriad other high-end Americhinese meters that cost half as much or less.
In the same vein, I've gotten **** because I don't want to pay $40 for Klein lineman's pliers that have sloppy knurling in the jaws that flattens out the first time you grab something other than copper, or $10/ea screwdrivers that strip out after 100 screws. Evidently anyone who doesn't own Kleins can't possibly have a clue in hell about electrical.
I'm sure every single person on this forum has caught some kind of **** for what tools they own, whether it be for being too cheap, or too expensive.
My real question and the point of this thread is, have you ever actually experienced tool discrimination to the point where it affected your ability to get a job, or to be allowed to perform a task at a job you already are working?
The other night I was showing my new Wright stuff to a friend that is an auto mechanic. His first response was, "I've never heard of them", but after handling the tools and an explanation from me of Wright's history of a company as well as their company mission, he admitted that the tools were, in fact, very nice. That's a bit besides the point. This thread isn't really about any specific brand.
What he said afterwards though, was what intruiged me, that, "I would love to have some of that in my box, but I wouldn't be able to get a job anywhere". I asked him what he meant, and he said that if he didn't have Snap-on tools, he couldn't get hired as a mechanic at any good shops.
I was really surprised, because I've always known that there is the "tool status" issue, as with many other aspects of life, but I never thought it was to the point where owning (or not owning) a certain brand of tool could directly have an effect on one's employability. He seemed dead serious about it too, so I have to assume that he either was told this by someone he trusted, or had actually experienced it himself.
I've personally experienced it to a lesser degree, where I was working a job, and the supervisor for that job (thank god it was an outside contract and I never had to work for him again) refused to let me do a calibration on some equipment because I was using my Tenma multimeter, and in his words, "Fluke is the only company that makes good meters, I don't see how you can expect to do good work with that no-name piece of ****".
That isn't the first time I've experienced something like that for refusing to pay a 400% inflated price for a Chinese made multimeter stamped "Designed in USA". Fluke still makes decent meters, but frankly there's no difference between them and myriad other high-end Americhinese meters that cost half as much or less.
In the same vein, I've gotten **** because I don't want to pay $40 for Klein lineman's pliers that have sloppy knurling in the jaws that flattens out the first time you grab something other than copper, or $10/ea screwdrivers that strip out after 100 screws. Evidently anyone who doesn't own Kleins can't possibly have a clue in hell about electrical.
I'm sure every single person on this forum has caught some kind of **** for what tools they own, whether it be for being too cheap, or too expensive.
My real question and the point of this thread is, have you ever actually experienced tool discrimination to the point where it affected your ability to get a job, or to be allowed to perform a task at a job you already are working?
Last edited:


