One key ingredient to most click type torque wrenches, micrometer adjustable style, is the rather large coil spring used to compress the release mechanism, requiring more or less force to break-over. I've attached a "see through" image from marketing for reference. We've done numerous tests where you have Wrench A go through 60,000 cycle calibration check, while Wrench B sits wound up to 75% of full scale with 0 cycles. Guess which ones falls out of calibration first over the same time period?
There is one exception however. If the springs are uniformly "broke-in"
before they enter the torque wrench you can limit and reduce these effects dramatically, but not eliminate it. It's one of a few process we do here at Precision Instruments to lessen the effect should someone forget to turn down the torque wrench to the lowest setting, or require the tool to remain set for a long duration of time (preset models for example).
Grab the latest copy of the Machinery's Handbook for the science behind a coil springs behavior. Many factors play a key role in operation and performance of a coil spring like those found in click type torque wrenches.
I would not base too much theory though on data received from one torque wrench test. If that one became more repeatable, it doesn't conclude 10 more will act the same. We retain months and months of data from our torque wrench cycle machines running two torque wrenches continually 365 days a year before any assumptions are made for product improvement. Ironically enough, two months ago we updated a process which improved our coil spring load memory by 40% at bottom scale, and 23% at full scale on most of our M line.
The article and test SK is referring to is accurate and similar to our in-house test data, speaking in generalities. I understand the point you are making TwoInch but it's all getting a bit off topic. With regards to how to store your torque wrench, follow the manufactures recommendation. Or yeah, or buy a Split-beam or Dial style
