danski0224 said:
That's what happens when people base decisions with long term costs on the initial purchase price.....
In the interest of brevity, my original post may have led you to believe that I made this decision lightly. This is not the case...
The bids I had were of the same R values (R44 ceiling, R19 walls, with foam sealing around doors and windows, and a 4 mil vapor barrier). The cost differential (foam vs fiberglass) was about $8000.
The building in question is not a home, rather a 2000 ft^2 unoccupied outbuilding. I minimally heat (45 or so) this building during the winter (nov-mar) with high efficiency heat, and do not plan to cool it. Here in MN, in an average winter, it has cost around $100 per month to heat this building.
If I use this bldg for the next 20 years (which is admittedly a wild a$$ guess), foam would need to save me $80 per heating month (average) over the next 20 years for it to justify the cost.
If the insulation properties are similar, how much would the better sealing of foam save me? 10%? 20%? 50%? Nobody, including the guy trying to sell it to me, was able to quantify this for me. For the sake of argument, lets say that foam will save me 20% (I think this generous).
Assuming winters to be equal, if I use 20% less fuel, fuel would need to average 4X its current cost to yield the magic $80 per heating month break even point. Could it happen. Certainly, but I doubt it will.
Is there a qualitative difference between the products? certainly.
Will it pay for itself over 20 years? In my situation, I highly doubt it.
Your situation? maybe.
-nosualc
ps - ETA - as this is a garage forum, I assumed we were all talking about garages. re-reading the OP, I see he was asking for opinions for garage and homes.