I bought a set of Husky wrenches recently for work since I was in need of a quick set cheap and these seemed to be nice for how cheap they were.The only thing I hate about them is the fact they are the lobster claw style. From my understanding some places are getting rid of their regular styles and going to the lobster claw for some crazy reason.
Perhaps lesser quality steel led to the use of more material to attain the same strength?
Lesser quality steel is a dead ringer for me, BUT why would've Proto done it this way? Did the wrench style we know of today not start coming around until the 70's?
We'll, proto usualy caters to the industral market.
A big open end might be stronger and alot of industral stuff isnt very cramped. All out strenght might have been more important than finesse.

For blaming you for starting the stupid lobster claw design. An older maintenance guy at work was repairing one of our machines when I noticed this. Some of you guys might be able to date the wrench, but maybe USA started the trend?![]()
We have a winner!Perhaps lesser quality steel led to the use of more material to attain the same strength?

No, all the extra meat in the open end.
My understanding of a lobster claw is this


Improvements have been made slowly over time in regard to metallurgy. For example, the steel in the 20's (think Titanic), was worse than after WWII, which was worse than what was produced in say the '80's and beyond.I think what you people are not realizing is, this is an OLD wrench, it was made in the time of when steel was steel.
Strange.....my understanding was that the "lobster claw" was in reference to the "ratcheting" open ended wrenches like the link, not a wrench with a bit of extra meat on it. Theyre a "claw" bc the notch makes the end a bit pointier and curved than normal, just like a lobster claw.
Improvements have been made slowly over time in regard to metallurgy. For example, the steel in the 20's (think Titanic), was worse than after WWII, which was worse than what was produced in say the '80's and beyond.
Things like tighter control of content to produce a given alloy, and improved uniformity of grain structure became possible by improved heating techniques, equipment, and less contamination during production. It's expensive, so it didn't happen overnight.
It's even allowed for the creation of alloys that weren't possible in years past.
There is a thread out there of someone asking Sears on "why" the lobster claw? Supposedly Sears response was to combat jaw spreading at higher than normal torques versus regular size wrenches and not due to inferior metal or forging practices.
Were all lucky that Sears decided to clear that up for us.
![]()
Versus what? People pulling comments out of their *** that it must be inferior metal for the lobster claw with nothing to back it up other than their opinion?
The point I am making is that nobody know for sure.
No, all the extra meat in the open end.

My understanding of a lobster claw is this

................
And you're wrong about no one knowing. Sears knows.
Taking my words out of context, I meant no one actively posting in this thread knows for sure. Like any legal construct in this country, it is on the accuser to prove the guilt and not the accused to prove their innocence.
Until someone who has their ******* bunched thinking it is inferior metal in these tools for the lobster claw design sends one out for lab analysis testing, the benefit of the doubt "should" rest with Sears and why they claim they are what they are.
I believe someone on here offered to conduct a pull test.
Lesser quality steel is a dead ringer for me, BUT why would've Proto done it this way? Did the wrench style we know of today not start coming around until the 70's?
....
Until someone who has their ******* bunched thinking it is inferior metal in these tools for the lobster claw design sends one out for lab analysis testing, the benefit of the doubt "should" rest with Sears and why they claim they are what they are.
Irregardless of the factual out come of why they have the lobster claw, I think it still is a hideous design from even a marketing standpoint.