To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

induction hardening vs. conventional heat treating

To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

MXtras

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 17, 2005
Messages
1,356
Location
On the Right Coast
Inductive hardening and conventional hardening perform the same basic function. Induction hardening is faster for production purposes and can be much less 'global' - it is possible to be selective about the surfaces to be heated rather than having to heat the entire component just to harden a specific area or region - like the ways on the base of a lathe. The process is more controllable and far faster than conventional heat treating and is considered to be a cleaner process with less or no scale.

The speed aspect of induction heating can actually be detrimental as many times a temperature soak required with conventional heating helps homogenize the grain structure of the material and can lead to a substantial reduction in work induced stress. A part that has been conventionally heat treated or hardened is typically less thermally stressed than a component that has been induction hardened - but this is, among other factors, material and shape dependant. Each process has a set of pros and cons - just like everything in engineering.

Scott
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

CraigFL

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 1, 2005
Messages
704
Location
Panama City, FL
There are also special steel alloys that respond to induction hardening better which may give the tools different characteristics. There are too many variables to say that one is better than another including your usage...
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!
Top Bottom