To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

Insulation - which one

kerwinq

Well-known member
Joined
May 2, 2009
Messages
52
Location
Boise, Id
I am putting in insulation in the 16 x 42 addition that I just did but am torn between the blow in and roll, am planning on doing at least R30. Lowes has R38 on clearance for $26 for a 64 sq ft roll.

What would be the best way to go?

Thanks, Kerwin
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

SnowBlaZeR2

Well-known member
Joined
May 17, 2010
Messages
961
Location
Texas
I'm not sure what code is up there, but down here it depends on where the insulation is going. I believe it's 30 for ceilings, 13 for walls, and 19 for floors down here. I couldn't recommend blow in or rolled because I have only ever used rolled. It's pretty easy to use though.


*edit
Assuming I have your area correct, it looks like the minimum is 38 for ceilings, 19 for walls and 30 for floors. Like I said, I'm no expert, but I have done insulation a few times.
 
Last edited:

sammm

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 7, 2010
Messages
609
Location
North Carolina
I added more roll-in to our last house...it's a job climbing over/around trusses and crawling across joists so you don't fall thru your ceiling.

Had blown-in done in the current house (mostly because it was already blown-in, just not enough). I think blown-in will give you better coverage, just be sure you keep your soffit vents vented.
 

Scramblur

Well-known member
Joined
May 21, 2010
Messages
160
This week I had R-34 blown in insulation added to 800sq. ft. of garage and R-19 added to 1850 sq. ft. of my house. The guys were there for about 2-2.5 hours and it cost me $1k. Questar gas here in Utah is cutting me a check back for $300. Total cost $700. I couldn't do it myself for anywhere close to these prices.
 

ddawg16

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 11, 2008
Messages
21,005
Location
S. California
Are you talking wall or ceiling?

I'm going to assume ceiling....blown-in is cheaper....but settles over time and is a real PIA to work around.....
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

stevejh82

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 10, 2009
Messages
251
Location
Ohio
You'll get a better job with blown in insulation, it will seal tighter around trusses, joists, etc. You can rent a machine to blow to blow it in yourself. If my measurements are correct you are looking at around $290 dollars for the batten insulation (plus tax). To blow that in cellulose insulation you would need roughly 37 bags. If the price is close enough, I would definitely go with the cellulose (blown in) insulation.
 
Joined
Apr 19, 2010
Messages
16
Location
Marietta, GA
blown is the only way to go with attic floors, I have customers ask for rolled all the time, not a good idea, rolled will not get all the voids like loose-fill, save yourself some time and money and get a good fiberglass blown in, two of the best are insulsafe sp & pro-pink, in GA insulsafe is a bit cheaper per foot, batt insulation is designed for vertical walls, some insulation contractors even blow vertical. I wouldn't use cellulose, its ground up newspaper, attracts insects, also after a few years the flame retardant chemicals will dissapate and the stuff burns real nice and hot.
 

tdkkart

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 17, 2006
Messages
6,887
Location
Eastern Iowa
If you decide to go blown-in, definitely check on having someone do it, I had a bunch done last fall, couldn't even think about doing it myself for what they charged. Also check on energy rebates, I got 70% of mine paid for.
 
OP
K

kerwinq

Well-known member
Joined
May 2, 2009
Messages
52
Location
Boise, Id
It is for ceiling. Thanks for all the help, just need to see which would be the cheaper of the two
 

PaulR

Well-known member
Joined
May 25, 2010
Messages
728
Location
Hadley MA
Cellulose blown in for attics is the way to go, I've had multiple pro's tell me that recently here in the Northeast. One guy was a contractor, the other was a home inspector. Niether had very kind words at all for the pink stuff.
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!
Top Bottom