To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

Joining 2" PVC to steel

green.bubbly

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 14, 2008
Messages
2,156
Location
Lafayette, LA
POCO engineer came out and approved my meter location. Looked at where I need to run my underground service conduit and told me that due to the length of the run, I needed to use steel elbows.

Ignorant me assumed there was a pvc to steel coupling. HD and Lowes could only manage a head scratch. So is there such a product?

This house building project has been a big learning experience. I have not learned this much stuff since my first ******* magazine. :)
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

Stuart in MN

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 8, 2005
Messages
23,135
Location
Minneapolis
Yes, they have PVC to rigid conduit adapter fittings. I would have expected HD and Lowes to have them in stock, but they're available at any electrical supply house.
 
OP
G

green.bubbly

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 14, 2008
Messages
2,156
Location
Lafayette, LA
Yes, they have PVC to rigid conduit adapter fittings. I would have expected HD and Lowes to have them in stock, but they're available at any electrical supply house.

Thanks for the reply. They probably had what I needed in stock. They just had no clue what I actually needed.
 
OP
G

green.bubbly

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 14, 2008
Messages
2,156
Location
Lafayette, LA



I have just under 200 feet of eithe #1 or #2. The poco provides the service conductors. :) :)

He did not specify thin wall or rigid. When he said a steel elbow, I asked him if I needed a steel sweep and he said no, just a regular elbow.

But now that I know what kind of coupling I need I will go with rigid since it is already threaded and the thin wall is not. I only need two thankfully.


Thanks for your help and the links.
 

Charles (in GA)

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 11, 2006
Messages
12,489
Location
50 mi south of Atlanta
It will have to be a sweep ell to get the cable thru, sounds like the guy didn't know what he was talking about. If he was the engineer, that may explain it. I had a POCO engineer give me all kinds of mis information, which the line crew straightened me out about when they were there.

Charles
 

Norcal

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 16, 2008
Messages
13,764
If the metallic sweeps are too close to the surface they will need to bonded, I think (But am not sure) if they have 24" of cover it will not be needed......... Code citations will be needed.
 
OP
G

green.bubbly

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 14, 2008
Messages
2,156
Location
Lafayette, LA
It will have to be a sweep ell to get the cable thru, sounds like the guy didn't know what he was talking about. If he was the engineer, that may explain it. I had a POCO engineer give me all kinds of mis information, which the line crew straightened me out about when they were there.

Charles


This is from their residential guide which pretty much follows his requirements. Not sure if this is considered a sweep ell.


verbage.jpg




If the metallic sweeps are too close to the surface they will need to bonded, I think (But am not sure) if they have 24" of cover it will not be needed......... Code citations will be needed.


Trench depth must be 3 feet. With an 18" rigid elbow, I should have 24" of cover. I will probably trench a little deeper just to be sure.
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

sberry

Banned
Joined
Jun 18, 2005
Messages
35,747
Location
Brethren, Michigan
I was wondering on how they would treat the bonding in this case, good thing to point out. In most cases plastic is the best thing they ever invent, reduces a lot of headache.
 

Naq

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 2, 2010
Messages
47
Location
SE PA
I was wondering on how they would treat the bonding in this case, good thing to point out. In most cases plastic is the best thing they ever invent, reduces a lot of headache.

You're right, and this is one of the exceptions. I ask for grounding bushings when the metallic sweeps stub up above grade.


NEC 250.80 Service Raceways and Enclosures
"Metal enclosures and raceways for service conductors and
equipment shall be connected to the grounded system conductor
if the electrical system is grounded or to the grounding
electrode conductor for electrical systems that are not
grounded.

Exception: A metal elbow that is installed in an underground
nonmetallic raceway and is isolated from possible contact by
a minimum cover of 450 mm (18 in.)
to any part of the elbow
shall not be required to be connected to the grounded system
conductor or grounding electrode conductor.
The exception to 250.80 recognizes that metal sweep elbows
are often installed in underground installations of nonmetallic
conduit. The metal elbows are installed because nonmetallic
elbows can be damaged from the friction caused by
taut conductor pull lines or ropes rubbing against the interior
of the elbow throat. The elbows are isolated from physical
contact by burying the entire elbow at a depth not less than
18 in. below grade."
 

Provincial

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 21, 2011
Messages
6,871
Location
Near Salem, OR
Our POCO allows the use of fiberglass sweeps for the larger/longer pulls instead of the metal ones. This avoids the need for grounding. You should ask your POCO if they will approve fiberglass for just that reason.

The sweeps need to be resistant to abrasion from the wire insulation during the pulling process. PVC will wear away with even minor rubbing from the insulation during pulling. Apparently, fiberglass has adequate abrasion resistance.

BTW, I strongly suggest requesting the POCO meet with you (preferably on-site) to review the project. Usually, the engineer they send will be able to modify their requirements to fit the "real world" situation that you have, as well as approve alternate options that they don't want to commit to in their published requirements.
 
Last edited:
OP
G

green.bubbly

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 14, 2008
Messages
2,156
Location
Lafayette, LA
Our POCO allows the use of fiberglass sweeps for the larger/longer pulls instead of the metal ones. This avoids the need for grounding. You should ask your POCO if they will approve fiberglass for just that reason.

The sweeps need to be resistant to abrasion from the wire insulation during the pulling process. PVC will wear away with even minor rubbing from the insulation during pulling. Apparently, fiberglass has adequate abrasion resistance.

BTW, I strongly suggest requesting the POCO meet with you (preferably on-site) to review the project. Usually, the engineer they send will be able to modify their requirements to fit the "real world" situation that you have, as well as approve alternate options that they don't want to commit to in their published requirements.

I will check with them on the FG sweeps. The line will be buried deep enough to cover the steel but I would think FB would outlast steel.

The POCO did come out to my location. I wanted him to verify that where I wanted my meter would be acceptable.
 

PRH44

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 25, 2009
Messages
563
Location
Indiana
Provincial has a very good point. Meetings with the utility can solve alot of issues and clear up any confusion. Most enginners you will meet with will be very helpful and willing to explain exactly what they expect to see.

Good luck
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!
Top Bottom