TK-421
Well-known member
Are you desperate for money? If the answer is no then keep the better tool. If the answer is yes, then sell them and buy cheaper sockets.
I'd keep them AND buy the $15 Gearwrench set so I could keep my snappy's pristine and save them for when I really need them.
Look at the ridiculous amount of chamfer on the Gearwrench socket versus the Snap-on. Sure, maybe you can slip it onto the bolt head ever so slightly more easily, but is it really worth giving up all that contact area? This is especially an issue for thin bolt heads, with that much chamfer and a thin bolt head you can end up with almost no bite at all and just slip right off. I suppose it might rarely be an issue in practice, but I did actually run into the issue recently with a stubborn thin head bolt and a 32mm Taiwan-made socket where a Snap-on or USA Williams with less chamfer would've made all the difference. Given the choice, though, I'd rather have the most bite possible in all circumstances.
Consider yourself uninformed/underinformed on this topic then.

Sorry my mistake. This is the first time I've heard someone lodge that complaint.
So the variance in contact area looks like what, 5% at this nut height? Looks like you'd have to have a 0.5mm tall 13mm nut for this to be an issue...
But hey, I guess every little bit counts?
The thin panel switch nut I show in my picture is a good example of this problem in action. A standard Snap-on deep socket could probably grab this nut pretty well and remove it, one of my modified sockets with zero chamfer could remove it easily with 100% socket engagement on the nut, and a Gearwrench socket might not be able to remove the nut at all because the chamfer is too deep so the socket will not engage enough of the thin sidewalls of the nut for it to turn.