To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

Less Boobies (avatars)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Blue

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 15, 2005
Messages
1,117
Location
Northern Illinois
I browse Garage Journal at work. And I don't think anyone cares, because to them, it's just a bunch of words with some photos of cars, garages, and tools.

But then I'm scrolling through a post, and all of a sudden someone has a racy picture of some chick as their avatar. I'm always afraid of having that on my screen right when HR walks behind me.

Can we have some sort of policy about not having R Rated pics in avatars?
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

CNGsaves

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 26, 2012
Messages
13,233
Location
KS and OK
Good luck with that one !! :lol: :dunno: :evil:

Might want to also start a "Clean-Up" at your workplace to remove all TV's, magazines, etc. that could possibly be used to see any cleavage.

Send in written modification to your employer's Terms of Use of Electronic Devices that you "promise" to close your eyes while surfing internet at your workplace and see any kind of cleavage or pics of women. See what HR says then !!! :D :D :D
 

Haveblue

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 8, 2013
Messages
1,484
Location
kansas
Well, you ARE supposed to be working. I havent seen any avatars that seem offensive. Look at some **** everyday,and make sure they see it to "de-sensitize" them!:scared: LOL!
 
Last edited:

LEVE

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 23, 2008
Messages
1,727
Location
On the Willapa
OK... as an ol' network guy for a fortune 500 company I used to run programs that would ID "inappropriate" picts on employee computers. It's a amazing what a mathematical algorithm can do. When something was found, the employee's managers, security and HR were all notified and the ton of bricks released on the offender.

So, yes, I can see this request as a valid one.... as much as we all want to joke, poke fun, or otherwise ridicule a simple request... these things could cost a guy his job. That's not fun... but then, I guess it's not your problem, your kid, your wife, your employer's HR ain't looking over your shoulder. But just remember, the NSA is! Enjoy your night.
 

4xdog

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 18, 2012
Messages
5,641
Location
Santa Fe, NM
Be careful what you ask for...

Less and fewer are similar word that have subtle differences in meaning.

Less refers to lower quantities of "mass" nouns. Things that can't be counted. One wants less clutter on one's desk or one may look for less aggravation at work.

Fewer refers to "count" nouns. Things that can be counted. One wants fewer telephone interruptions or fewer weeds in the yard.

I don't think less boobies is any solution at all! The worst of both worlds. (smile)
 

porschedude996TT

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 28, 2007
Messages
2,384
Location
Santa Maria, California
Where are they? It is not as they are bare breasted is it? If so, where are they? I am so tired of corporate America with the Puritan Bull ****! Wake up and smell the hormones. We have certain desires and needs! Yes, everyone...
 
Last edited:

gatewaysysop

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 11, 2008
Messages
3,303
Location
Arizona
I browse Garage Journal at work. And I don't think anyone cares, because to them, it's just a bunch of words with some photos of cars, garages, and tools.

But then I'm scrolling through a post, and all of a sudden someone has a racy picture of some chick as their avatar. I'm always afraid of having that on my screen right when HR walks behind me.

Can we have some sort of policy about not having R Rated pics in avatars?

So to make sure I have it straight, let me do the office thing and repeat what you just said:

You want folks to censor themselves on an Internet forum because where you work, some of the avatars would be inappropriate and, rather than take some small measure of personal responsibility and actually do your job, you want everyone here to bear the responsibility so you can not do your job, but in relative safety? Do I have that right?

Yeah... wouldn't hold my breath on that one. ;)
 
Last edited:

Haveblue

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 8, 2013
Messages
1,484
Location
kansas
To ask some of the members here to change thier avatars is unreasonable. I think most of us can agree the mods here keep things clean..let the mods decide. You are talking about work..The fact that you want to hide screwing around on the net at work, means you shouldnt be doing it. Like most auto techs, I use the net daily, but for work purposes only. Research is one thing, but screwing around on the net at work isnt gettin the job done.
 

CNGsaves

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 26, 2012
Messages
13,233
Location
KS and OK
Here's a few of recent EXCELLENT avatars of GJer's:

All are fine IMHO, and in good taste, and much less revealing than any Victoria's Secret commercial that I see on TV everyday.
 

Attachments

  • BurgerKong_avatar_brunette.JPG
    BurgerKong_avatar_brunette.JPG
    17 KB · Views: 36
  • Bobbyb_avatar.jpg
    Bobbyb_avatar.jpg
    4.5 KB · Views: 483
  • Bouchard93_avatar.jpg
    Bouchard93_avatar.jpg
    4.2 KB · Views: 481
  • BrookeBurke_as_Herb_avatar.jpg
    BrookeBurke_as_Herb_avatar.jpg
    5.9 KB · Views: 484
  • BrookeBurke_Pic2_as_Herb_avatar.jpg
    BrookeBurke_Pic2_as_Herb_avatar.jpg
    3.7 KB · Views: 481
  • GJ_Jason280_avatar_20120225010743.jpg
    GJ_Jason280_avatar_20120225010743.jpg
    3.9 KB · Views: 485

Haveblue

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 8, 2013
Messages
1,484
Location
kansas
OK... as an ol' network guy for a fortune 500 company I used to run programs that would ID "inappropriate" picts on employee computers. It's a amazing what a mathematical algorithm can do. When something was found, the employee's managers, security and HR were all notified and the ton of bricks released on the offender.

So, yes, I can see this request as a valid one.... as much as we all want to joke, poke fun, or otherwise ridicule a simple request... these things could cost a guy his job. That's not fun... but then, I guess it's not your problem, your kid, your wife, your employer's HR ain't looking over your shoulder. But just remember, the NSA is! Enjoy your night.

Its not my problem because I dont have time to screw around on my pc at work looking at things I shouldnt, You have it backwards. I dont mean to insult you, or argue, but I cant believe the argument is being made to "tone it down" so "I dont get in trouble at work"
 

therealwormey

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 18, 2010
Messages
486
so you dont feel guilty for reading GJ and getting paid for it, but you want others to feel guilty that their avatar might get you in trouble...........im sorry i cant rationalize how you could fathom anybody actually caring if you get in trouble goofing off when your on the clock..you didnt say you were on break browsing so i can only assume your on the company dime.
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

therealwormey

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 18, 2010
Messages
486
i think your own words describe this thread best.

I don't think anyone cares

I browse Garage Journal at work. And I don't think anyone cares, because to them, it's just a bunch of words with some photos of cars, garages, and tools.

But then I'm scrolling through a post, and all of a sudden someone has a racy picture of some chick as their avatar. I'm always afraid of having that on my screen right when HR walks behind me.

Can we have some sort of policy about not having R Rated pics in avatars?
 
Last edited:

schmelpboy

Banned
Joined
Jun 24, 2012
Messages
1,717
You should be working at work, not browsing a website for fun. If you are on break, HR has no say in what you do. But, you should still not be using a work computer for anything you think could get you in trouble. If you can't get by 8-5 without getting on GJ, I understand...but you should have some self restraint.
 

54FordPanel

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 7, 2009
Messages
5,711
Location
Fort 54, Littleton, Co
Do you write to Sports Illustrated about once a year? I've yet to see an R rated avatar. Some are PG, but nothing worse than you would see at a beach.

I have a feeling this will be the biggest thread ever in 'Questions and Suggestions'.
 

Bull

Super Moderator
Joined
Dec 12, 2005
Messages
16,189
Location
MA
Turn off sigs and avatars in your control panel and only browse at work when logged into your account so they aren't displayed.

Problem for YOU solved, nonexistent problem for the rest of us still nonexistent. :)
 

Interex

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 20, 2010
Messages
960
Location
Dallas, TX
Wow, some of you guys have either never worked in the corporate world of today or in offices with very relaxed internet usage policies. As a mid-level manager, I've had to fire employees over images like these. HR doesn't take to anything racy very well. With ****** harassment claims filed for the smallest of things, it's often a zero tolerance policy. And to those that say you should be working, we all take breaks from time to time. It's nice to hop on GJ to check on my subscribed threads and forums.

And yes, regardless of if you are on break or not, anything you do on the company network is still very much a part of your employers business.
 

jd_1138

Well-known member
Joined
May 8, 2013
Messages
17,108
Location
NE Ohio
I am sure HR would have more of a problem with someone farting around on co. time than the fact there was an avatar showing a woman in a bikini.
 

jd_1138

Well-known member
Joined
May 8, 2013
Messages
17,108
Location
NE Ohio
Wow, some of you guys have either never worked in the corporate world of today or in offices with very relaxed internet usage policies. As a mid-level manager, I've had to fire employees over images like these. HR doesn't take to anything racy very well. With ****** harassment claims filed for the smallest of things, it's often a zero tolerance policy. And to those that say you should be working, we all take breaks from time to time. It's nice to hop on GJ to check on my subscribed threads and forums.

And yes, regardless of if you are on break or not, anything you do on the company network is still very much a part of your employers business.

If someone is allowed a certain amount of internet usage at your co., and they were looking at women in bikinis, that's not ****** harrassment. But hell who knows what they've twisted that into meaning these days. ;) I thought it meant making unwanted advances towards co-workers or underlings and offering perks for ****** favors or threatening to fire someone if they didn't give into ****** requests.

Guys, better hide your tool truck girlie calenders, or HR might write you up for harrassing the ladies at work who are offended at looking at fit women posing.
320803965528.jpg
 
Last edited:

gatewaysysop

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 11, 2008
Messages
3,303
Location
Arizona
Wow, some of you guys have either never worked in the corporate world of today or in offices with very relaxed internet usage policies. As a mid-level manager, I've had to fire employees over images like these. HR doesn't take to anything racy very well. With ****** harassment claims filed for the smallest of things, it's often a zero tolerance policy. And to those that say you should be working, we all take breaks from time to time. It's nice to hop on GJ to check on my subscribed threads and forums.

And yes, regardless of if you are on break or not, anything you do on the company network is still very much a part of your employers business.

Take breaks? Sure, nobody works non-stop. And yes, it is nice to scope out the subscribed threads on GJ during the day, maybe even during said breaks at work. But on company hardware, connected to the web via the company's network? Not so much.

There is no free lunch. You take the risk or you play on your own time and your own connection. To re-iterate what I said before, if the OP doesn't want to get caught with his pants down, the onus is on him and nobody else. This whole notion of "do your part so a complete stranger doesn't get busted" is one of the most ridiculous things I have ever seen.
 

softailgarage

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 20, 2011
Messages
5,153
Location
Bullhead City, Az.
Wow, some of you guys have either never worked in the corporate world of today or in offices with very relaxed internet usage policies. As a mid-level manager, I've had to fire employees over images like these. HR doesn't take to anything racy very well. With ****** harassment claims filed for the smallest of things, it's often a zero tolerance policy. And to those that say you should be working, we all take breaks from time to time. It's nice to hop on GJ to check on my subscribed threads and forums.

And yes, regardless of if you are on break or not, anything you do on the company network is still very much a part of your employers business.

You've FIRED people over this? In the words of Jeff Spicoli, "yer a ****!"
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!
Top Bottom