Nope not Aircat.I thought I remember reading that Aircat is or was making some of the Matco units.
Nope not Aircat.I thought I remember reading that Aircat is or was making some of the Matco units.
Not if it is a 2769 or 2779.It matches my big Marco which I thought was ingersol?
It looks to me as if during development they had durability issues and then choked the motor to reduce power and hit a life goal requirement. If you look at the inlet holes that feed air into the motor cylinder, they are normally two pie shaped cast holes but in the stubby the cast holes have been closed of and there is only a small drilled or cast hole to feed air.Again, I've not tried the stubby, but I have seen quite a few impacts start pretty weak out of the box, but get substantially better as they get broke in. Not sure if that was the situation on your IR test, but it's possible.
Yes !Are air impacts still a thing?
And air tools are lighter, smaller and less expensive.Yes !
I think the "executive summary" is, for professional/every day use, battery, especially brushless, DO have the power. However, they don't live as long as pneumatics which can easily be rebuilt.
And typically more durable. No batteries to worry about dropping, separating from the tool, electric motors getting wet from cars dripping down or soaked in automotive fluids.And air tools are lighter, smaller and less expensive.