To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

M18 Fuel drill, hammer or no?

franzdom

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 7, 2009
Messages
3,136
Location
NC
I opted for the M18 Fuel compact drill 2603, as I rarely used the hammer function with my old V18 and I am used to having maximum torque from Milwaukee Magnum Holeshooters. So many people opt for the hammer drill 2607 but it's a LOT lower torque spec, 525 in-lb vs 725 for the non hammer version.

What do you think and why?:headscrat
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

sac02

Well-known member
Joined
May 15, 2011
Messages
446
I have an SDS hammer drill for heavy hammering, I'm generally OK with a straight up drill for drilling.
 

rlitman

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 18, 2010
Messages
24,603
Location
Long Island
You're comparing apples and bananas. The 2602 is a Fuel model. 2607 is not.

2604 is the hammer version of that Fuel drill, and the torque spec is the same.
Note that in the Fuel drills, the larger capacity battery also delivers more torque (because the peak current delivered by the smaller batteries limits torque).

If you have the choice of hammer or not in the same model drill, the hammer is almost always the better option.
I compared the 2602 and 2604 when I bought mine. The 2604 was about the same length (maybe 1/16" longer), and felt the same weight. But the 2604 comes with a chuck that has carbide inserts that will not slip. It's well worth the extra $20 to get the better chuck.
 
OP
F

franzdom

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 7, 2009
Messages
3,136
Location
NC
Oops I was surprised, sorry about that. They have so many options for sure!
 

pl_silverado

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 1, 2005
Messages
2,033
Location
West Bradford, PA
You're comparing apples and bananas. The 2602 is a Fuel model. 2607 is not.

2604 is the hammer version of that Fuel drill, and the torque spec is the same.
Note that in the Fuel drills, the larger capacity battery also delivers more torque (because the peak current delivered by the smaller batteries limits torque).

If you have the choice of hammer or not in the same model drill, the hammer is almost always the better option.
I compared the 2602 and 2604 when I bought mine. The 2604 was about the same length (maybe 1/16" longer), and felt the same weight. But the 2604 comes with a chuck that has carbide inserts that will not slip. It's well worth the extra $20 to get the better chuck.


I would buy the cheaper drill, put that $ 20 towards a good Rohm chuck.
 

bcradio

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 30, 2012
Messages
6,017
Location
New Mexico
No question about it get the hammer fuel drill... Never know when you'll need the hammer function
 

firebox40dash5

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 19, 2012
Messages
4,185
I would buy the cheaper drill, put that $ 20 towards a good Rohm chuck.

I swapped a Rohm Supra off a Dewalt onto my old Makita drill. I dunno if I screwed it up getting it off the threadlocked Dewalt spindle or what, but it was a pain in my ***. Self-tightening meant self-loosening in reverse, or if you let off the trigger quick. :headscrat

Honestly, I haven't had a bit of trouble from whatever chuck (Jacobs I'm guessing?) came on my M12 Fuel.I do isually use bits with flats though.
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

williaty

Well-known member
Joined
May 16, 2010
Messages
829
Never get a hammer drill.

The hammer function is just one more thing to break. If you need the hammer function, then you need a rotary hammer, not a hammer drill. Hammer drills are a half-assed solution in search of a problem.
 

dutchgray

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 28, 2014
Messages
6,467
Location
Dorset. England.
Never get a hammer drill.

The hammer function is just one more thing to break. If you need the hammer function, then you need a rotary hammer, not a hammer drill. Hammer drills are a half-assed solution in search of a problem.

They are really only any use on softer masonry materials with smaller holes, if your doing any amount of masonry drilling then you want an SDS.
 

rice rocket

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 24, 2011
Messages
3,175
I got the hammer version since that's what came in the kit w/ the impact driver.

I've used the hammer drill function a few times, maybe a 2 dozen anchors into concrete and into CMU. It does fairly well, maybe 2 minutes for each 1/2" hole, 1.5" deep. I don't do it enough to warrant and SDS, and Milwaukee's got my back w/ a 5 year warranty so if it breaks, it doesn't cost me out of pocket.
 

jrw87

Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2013
Messages
16
I use my Fuel hammer drill everyday as a commercial electrician. Its the 2604, the 2603 has the same torque with no hammer I believe.

It doesnt have as much power as the 2611 but still enough to get the job done and easier to carry around all day hanging off a toolbelt.

Rotary hammers and impact drills are two different tools for different applications. You wouldnt want to drill red brick with an SDS anymore than you would want to drill green concrete with an impact drill.
 

bcradio

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 30, 2012
Messages
6,017
Location
New Mexico
Never get a hammer drill.

The hammer function is just one more thing to break. If you need the hammer function, then you need a rotary hammer, not a hammer drill. Hammer drills are a half-assed solution in search of a problem.

This is only accurate if you only drill concrete... Drilling brick, block, or other soft masonry and hammer drill is a must (unless you want it to chip and not be able to take any fasteners ).

So yes, definitely get a hammer drill if you don't already have one.
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!
Top Bottom