Some one questioned me on a previous thread where I described grenading a 1" drive Proto ratchet and a 3/4" drive New Britain ratchet on some stubborn fasteners om a couple of jobs.
That question was basically "why does everyone grab the ratchet rather than the pull handle for immovable bolts?"
My reply was pretty much, "you work with what you have available at the time".
Well, I got to thinking about it over the last few days and remember breaking more pull handles than ratchets over the years. So I made some calls and did some digging.
The old pear head 1 inch drive Proto ratchet is rated for something like 1375 foot pounds. The 1" drive sliding T handle is rated somewhere around 940 foot pounds.
When you step down to the little 3/4" drive ratchet, it's rated for 750 foot pounds. The pull handle and the sliding t are only rated for 565 foot pounds each.
I guess I won't waste any more money on pull handles.
That question was basically "why does everyone grab the ratchet rather than the pull handle for immovable bolts?"
My reply was pretty much, "you work with what you have available at the time".
Well, I got to thinking about it over the last few days and remember breaking more pull handles than ratchets over the years. So I made some calls and did some digging.
The old pear head 1 inch drive Proto ratchet is rated for something like 1375 foot pounds. The 1" drive sliding T handle is rated somewhere around 940 foot pounds.
When you step down to the little 3/4" drive ratchet, it's rated for 750 foot pounds. The pull handle and the sliding t are only rated for 565 foot pounds each.
I guess I won't waste any more money on pull handles.
I guess I have to revise my statement I made when I got it that the ratchet felt cheesy.