I've just got some new Milwaukee locking pliers to keep in my car.
On first inspection they are very similar to Irwins. They don't look/feel any better or worse to me.
Time for a hugely unscientific test to compare Milwaukee to Irwin. Grip the ring end of an old spanner and spend 30 seconds wrestling with it to to see how much the teeth get damaged.
Milwaukee teeth show damage but hold up quite well.
Irwin teeth flatten and round off quite easily.
Not very impressed that both pliers appeared to be made of softer metal than a cheap Draper spanner that I know from experience is made of cheese.
Just out of interest I brought out a wild card. Original Mole grips that used to belong to my friend's Dad.
With much effort I unable to leave any marks on the Mole grip's teeth. They just eat away at the chrome on the spanner.
I don't think Irwin or Milwaukee pliers will last long enough to be passed onto future generations of tool users to enjoy. They don't make them like they used to.
On first inspection they are very similar to Irwins. They don't look/feel any better or worse to me.
Time for a hugely unscientific test to compare Milwaukee to Irwin. Grip the ring end of an old spanner and spend 30 seconds wrestling with it to to see how much the teeth get damaged.
Milwaukee teeth show damage but hold up quite well.
Irwin teeth flatten and round off quite easily.
Not very impressed that both pliers appeared to be made of softer metal than a cheap Draper spanner that I know from experience is made of cheese.
Just out of interest I brought out a wild card. Original Mole grips that used to belong to my friend's Dad.
With much effort I unable to leave any marks on the Mole grip's teeth. They just eat away at the chrome on the spanner.
I don't think Irwin or Milwaukee pliers will last long enough to be passed onto future generations of tool users to enjoy. They don't make them like they used to.
Last edited:


