CHI_Tool&Die
Well-known member
What will save Snap-on is how limited in exposure the 100-tooth ratchets were. Matco hosed themselves by selling those defective Eighty8s for years.Probably. I seem to recall Matco having issues with their design, I want to say 1/2" drive in particular, and ended up issuing better rebuild kits and having dealers upgrade all the ratchets already stocked on the trucks, along with anyone else that had the issues.
Not bashing either of the two of them, but you sincerely have to wonder how a product makes it into the hands of customers with these kinds of issues right out of the gate. These don't seem like minor nuances that could have been missed in early testing, so it is somewhat disappointing that they weren't caught sooner. They wouldn't be the only two companies to release a turd at a premium price either, but even so, it's hard to rationalize a miss like that on something as simple a ratchet. That goes doubly given all the reputational damage that can result from a botched release like this. Maybe I just expect too much.![]()
I’m going to assume Snappy rushed their release because I cannot fathom how any QC would pass the ratchets. Those are issues that would have clearly been noticeable to anyone running a few tests on them.




