gatewaysysop
Well-known member
Lots of good stuff (mostly) in this thread. I agree, points to be had on both sides of the argument for and against HOAs.
In my personal experience, I rented for a couple years in a condo community with an HOA, but currently have my own home in an older, non-HOA community. I like to think I've seen shades of both sides of the coin, but 1 data point does not make for sound inference, much less a basis for broad generalization. that being the case, I'm staying out of the for/against argument.
However ,with that having being said, I did discover one thing about HOAs that is something I think most people should consider and that is who runs it. At least out this way, there are organizations that maintain the community and basically run everything for the HOA. The HOA still has a board and meetings, but all the day to day stuff, collection and spending of monies, repairs and upkeep is all handled by a third party. Turns out, complaints and enforcement also go through this third party.
The fact that the third-party maintained communities all over town resulted in, among other things, money problems, no timely enforcement, no timely repairs, poor maintenance (pool, grass, trees, parking lot, you name it) and their employees being, overall, absolutely apathetic to the concerns of the people living there and paying them. Of course the board loved them, because they were dirt cheap, so they never got fired (despite not being able to do repairs for a while because they nearly bankrupted themselves as a company). The implication was always that firing them and hiring someone else was going to cost money and nobody would pony up, so the status quo remained long after I left.
My honest advice, if you decide to live someplace with an HOA, is to definitely check out how things are run. If it's a fly-by-night, crooked, third-party managed deal like this, run like hell.
In my personal experience, I rented for a couple years in a condo community with an HOA, but currently have my own home in an older, non-HOA community. I like to think I've seen shades of both sides of the coin, but 1 data point does not make for sound inference, much less a basis for broad generalization. that being the case, I'm staying out of the for/against argument.
However ,with that having being said, I did discover one thing about HOAs that is something I think most people should consider and that is who runs it. At least out this way, there are organizations that maintain the community and basically run everything for the HOA. The HOA still has a board and meetings, but all the day to day stuff, collection and spending of monies, repairs and upkeep is all handled by a third party. Turns out, complaints and enforcement also go through this third party.
The fact that the third-party maintained communities all over town resulted in, among other things, money problems, no timely enforcement, no timely repairs, poor maintenance (pool, grass, trees, parking lot, you name it) and their employees being, overall, absolutely apathetic to the concerns of the people living there and paying them. Of course the board loved them, because they were dirt cheap, so they never got fired (despite not being able to do repairs for a while because they nearly bankrupted themselves as a company). The implication was always that firing them and hiring someone else was going to cost money and nobody would pony up, so the status quo remained long after I left.

My honest advice, if you decide to live someplace with an HOA, is to definitely check out how things are run. If it's a fly-by-night, crooked, third-party managed deal like this, run like hell.

Last edited:

and currently writing up something to change the CCRs to allow working on cars.
Really?