garfunkle24
Well-known member
Looks like Subaru got you![]()
Nope. Nevermind, it's all clear now; You're from Leeds....
Last edited:
Looks like Subaru got you![]()
Nope. Nevermind, it's all clear now; You're from Leeds....![]()
You must be an ex-pat if you know where Leeds is
from the tone of your posts I,m guessing Scotch or Cockney![]()
13,500 "active" members. Another 70,000 considered inactive. Some banned, some deceased, some "quit".
A small fraction of them would be willing to pay for print when they can get the web version for free.
There are a few professional trade magazines, but they are so obscure and often don't even have a real grasp on the ground level of the industry. Or prefer to talk about the verus and mode$06 and evap leaks all day.

You must be an ex-pat if you know where Leeds is
from the tone of your posts I,m guessing Scotch or Cockney![]()
Even worse, another Yorkshireman. Sheffield used to be home.![]()

More or less a Cockney then
Did you go to Canada to escape "The Human League"![]()
Yes.
Also, do you mean the cooling towers? I lived just off J35, so pretty close...
No great loss!
Anyhow, enjoy the forums. PM me if you ever need a translator on here![]()

Snap On is definitely not the only company that does that. Wright, Williams, Craftsman, Hazet...A friend of mine who was a Porsche mechanic for years told me that the only place where Snap-on tools are undoubtedly superior is in their sockets and box end wrenches.
Snap-on's design is patented and uses curved sides on the inside of the socket that grip the nut on the flats of the nut rather than the corners, ...
Yes, and they almost always rate the German tools as best. Funny how that works.
Thanks I will, why do they call toilets "rest rooms"? hardly relaxing at the best of times is it
![]()
Guys: I think the question imposed is not intended for trolling purposes. I am a young guy and will be investing soon on quality tools. Sure, there is nothing wrong in being biased towards a brand but purely from a technical perspective, what makes Snap-on tools so damn desirable?
I think this is completely logical to inquire and there is absolutely no intention ignite flame wars here. Calm down.
Without scientific evidence, I would have a hard time believing in anything...heck, I doubt myself often times and take a step back. Its a proper way to learn. I am an engineer and engineers have a data driven mindset. Sorry guys.
I have no problems in accepting the fact that Snap-on tools are better if there is sufficient data....but just the act of ASKING somehow is TROLLING? Why can't I question?![]()
(just kidding, I am an engineer). You mean they bought you.
Is anyone really naive enough to think that corporations do them favours?
Yes, isn't it weird that a country that places higher emphasis on empirical testing and data than chrome and marketing would have higher quality products....![]()
I had a German physics professor at university who constantly complained about the quality of German products because they were often overly complex designs with poor reliability and service.
Consumer Reports: "The larger (European) manufacturers, Audi, BMW and Mercedes-Benz, are among the worst automakers in overall quality. It turns out that expense and luxury don't always equate to reliability. Big luxury cars come with a lot of power equipment, electronic gizmos and complexity, and that means more chances for something to go wrong."
There is a lot of hype surrounding German products and quality (and a lot of it is seen on this forum).
SnapOn is the Harley Davidson of tools: Overhyped, overpriced etc
Germans engineer great chassis, suspensions, and braking systems. Everything else on a car? Varies from OK to terrible. Japanese are great at making cars reliable and easy/fast to work on. Good at engineering simplicity. Also great at designing reliable electronics systems. Americans are good at building full size trucks.
There is a lot of hype surrounding German products and quality (and a lot of it is seen on this forum).
The title of this thread needs to be changed to the Subjective comparison of Snap-on
