... I don't know how likely, but it's theoretically possible that by tripping the main 200A breaker, it _saved_ other equipment connected to your panel. If the surge came from upstream of the main breaker, and the 30A surge protector breaker had tripped instead, then the surge would have been allowed to continue to the rest of the panel after the surge protector sacrificed it's life.
Too often, these surge protectors burst into flames at the end of their life...
No, a breaker couldn't have protected from a surge. The inertia of the breaker's moving parts is far too great to allow a breaker to trip anywhere near fast enough.
Look at it this way. The timing of surges is measured in picoseconds (like the timing of the voltage rise in a TDR). The timing of a breaker opening is measured in milliseconds. The difference in their intervals is something like seven orders of magnitude.
Let's assume that the actual surge had enough energy to trip the breaker (it did not). The surge would have had time to pass through the breaker and enter the SPD. It would also continue on the bus past the SPD to the far end of the bus, and reflect back. That reflection would have passed through the main breaker in the opposite direction (and also been partly absorbed by the SPD) well before the breaker could possibly have had time to open. By then, the remnants of the surge will already have propagated to all of the taps on the bus. On a side note, it is because of this reflection that it is recommended that the SPD be tapped furthest from the main on the bus.
So, here's what most likely happened:
The surge passed through the main breaker. lt entered the SPD, and as soon as the voltage rose above the clamping voltage, the MOVs within formed a dead short, which effectively drops the voltage to beneath the clamping voltage. This releases the energy of the surge as heat, but because the duration of the surge is so short, the energy is limited. So far so good, this is normal operation, and the MOV should re-open after the surge passes.
When the MOV fails however, it stays closed, shunting the system voltage across it, and releasing far more energy until the fuses or breakers upstream of it open. The way it is SUPPOSED to work, is that the internal fuses interrupt the current and take the shorted MOV out of the circuit (on high voltage applications, this uses an explosive charge). But if the fuses fail, then the circuit breaker will take its place. However, as demonstrated by the OP, if you re-close the breaker with the fuses in a failed state, the short across the MOVs will start a fire within the SPD. IMNSHO, this is either an inexcusable major manufacturing design flaw in using insufficient fuses to match the SCCR of the panel, OR an engineering mistake by the installation of an SPD that was insufficient for the panel.
Is anyone running the din rail ones that become part of the electrical panel? Like Schneider electric or other brands.
The form factor of an SPD has nothing to do with its effectiveness. A DIN rail SPD would make sense if you had a DIN rail panel. I cannot imagine fitting one inside any residential panel, and in anything other than a DIN rail enclosure, the status LED would be blocked. Use the form factor that fits your purposes best.
Oh ok must be different down here. Din rail is everywhere down here. go to the electrical store and ask for a distribution board (what we call electrical panel) it will be din rail.
Yep, it's a regional thing. Like I said, if you have a DIN rail panel, then a DIN rail SPD will be a good fit.
I have never seen it or heard a reliable acount of this happening.
The most recent encounter I personally had with a surge damaging an inverter, was in the VFD for a motor in a residential elevator (I promptly installed a whole house SPD in that panel after that event). Surges have the potential to cause damage. Whether or not you consider accounts of surges causing damage to be reliable is another story.