+48 on 'you are not dealing with 'simple' concrete slab construction' there.
If the plans/contract (from the architect or Professional Engineer) call for 3000psi concrete and the concrete guys put in 2500 psi concrete, raise holy-heck with the architect/engineer/builder about that. And make them 'sign-off' on that aspect of the build.
If Building Codes in your area call out for minimum 3000 psi concrete, then you have a 'fail' right there.
Never mind your future plans of putting in a 2-post lift, if the original slab/foundation (in your area, the two are kind of combined) is inadequate, then you are looking at possible problems down the road.
2-post lift on a post-tensioned slab is not in the 'usual' category of 'typical' installation of the lift onto a 'plain' slab.
So you would need to contact your engineer (Professional Engineer) and/or the lift company for guidance regarding the installation of the lift onto the slab.
But for the overall original question/concern regarding the 'incorrect' slab:
If the architect/engineer called for 3000 psi minimum concrete for the concrete work, then the concrete guys flubbed it. Redo.
If the concrete guys want to go and try and do a whole bunch of core samples and 'prove' to the engineer/architect that the concrete they used was actually 'good enough' and the engineer/architect agrees to some sort of core sample testing (and no, just one or two core samples does not count as enough samples to take/do) and will 'accept' that, as well as the now pock-marked holes in the slab that then have to get filled in, then maybe all the parties involved can go that route.
If the plans and/or contract/bid/whatever with the concrete guys called for or specified 3000 psi minimum concrete and they used 2500 psi concrete, then the concrete guys either made a mistake or tried to 'cheat' you. Redo.
If the concrete guys used 2500 psi concrete 'mix' but ended up putting 'extra' water in to make it easier to slop the concrete around, then you didn't even get '2500 psi' concrete.
At the least I'd say you are looking at the architect/engineer reviewing the detailed plans and calculations regarding the slab and verifying whether the slab/foundation is 'ok' or not and if it meets Building Codes or not. Cause that is part of what they are/were payed for, not for you to really have to go and figure out. If they go and recheck all the calcs and Code-compliance and it is 'ok', then they have to document that.
Worse case, rip out the slab and have it redone. Again, not your problem and not your fault.
YMMV.