Caught this on CL and thought it was neat. I've never seen one before. Any idea as to age or manufacture? Asking $50 so I might go check it out. Thanks.
Go ahead. I'll turn on that hacksaw, drink a beer, and watch you do The Flintstone.Tinker toy. A bench vise and a decent hacksaw would be more useful.
IIRC those were supplied in kit form of raw castings.

I have a power hacksaw, but ten inch blades are a bit hard to find.
Pulled mine out of a scrap pile for free. Got it home, plugged it in & it worked just findI own a Sawmaster... bought it off Craigslist too. $100. I love it... it's really neat. Not as impractical as one may think. Cuts pretty well.
Doan, cut the vertical and then flip it to cut the vertical again. I don't have one, but it could work???
I always cut angle from the back... put it down so the point is facing up, so the blade hits it first.I set it up more permanently tonight, squared it up and cut a piece of 1/8" thick 1-1/4" angle iron. It zipped through the vertical part, then took like 15 min to get through the 1-1/4" flat part.
Digging up an old thread....
I found one of these in my great grandfather's barn. Here's the state I found it in:
![]()
These were sold as DIY kits in the late 60's though sometime in the 80's. In 1968 the kits sold for $18.95. The kit came a raw castings, the owner had to drill every hole and file everything to fit. I think this is why the few that are around look like they have been Macgyvered.
After a bath with Phosphoric acid and some wire wheeling it looked like this:
![]()
The chain was clearly too short to go around a sprocket (which was missing) on the 1/2" shaft. With some more research I found this pic in the Jan. 1968 Popular Mechanics:
![]()
This clearly showed a reduced shaft and a 9-tooth sprocket (I added the annotations). I guessed that the sprocket was 1/4" bore and I actually found a 9-tooth 1/4" bore sprocket. The reduced shaft had broken off of mine. I rigged it up in my drill press to drill and tap a 1/4" hole for a bolt to hold the sprocket:
![]()
Here it is fully assembled and temporarily rigged to a motor for a test run:
![]()
![]()
Video of the test run here:
It sawed through that 1/2" conduit in about 20 sec. It uses 8" blades, I just punched a hole at 8" in a longer blade and broke the remainder off.
Edit: Big socket on the end of the arm acts as a weight to make it saw faster.
You will probably get better blade and saw life if you slow if down some. That is running way fast.
So if i go slower, can I use more weight?
I've got a mid-sized one in the basement (I say 'midsized' because there were some BIG industrial models).
I've heard the real benefit from them is the clean, perfectly square cut, which you don't always get with a horizontal bandsaw, and definitely don't get with a hand-held saw.
So if i go slower, can I use more weight?
Hmmm... only vaguely resembles my Sawmaster... first of that model I've seen.damn thing must weigh 300lb....3rd pic is after the initial clean up.... it was BLACK when I dragged it home.