My opinion of those welds, from a couple of pictures over the 'Net?
Iffy.
Suspect (iffy) fusion/penetration (several weld areas appear to be sitting on 'top' of the parent material and not melted/fused/welded
into the parent material to achieve the desired welding Zen-state of Oneness).
Sloppy/uneven 'fill' of the welds into the gap/groove, leaving 'holes' in the joint with no weld bead in them.
End of the world for something static like a work bench? Probably not.
'Adequate' for a trailer that goes on the road? Probably not. On a trailer,
if something breaks or goes wrong, it will probably be while the trailer is loaded and going down the road at speed. Which means that things would get 'bad' in an instant. NG.
re: flux core welds There is nothing necessarily inherently 'wrong' with using FCAW
in the right application. And with adequate skill and the correct parameters.
In general, for the same diameter wire compared between FCAW-S and GMAW in short-circuit transfer mode (pretty much the only 'MIG' welding you can do with the 'little' wire-feed welders, where 'little' is any machine less than the 250-class machines that have the voltage and amperage ability to get into spray-transfer mode GMAW
with the appropriate shielding gas(es)), the FCAW wire will run 'hotter' than the solid wire.
Has to do with the current-density flowing through the electrode.
Since the FCAW wire has a flux-core (duh

), the actual metal in the wire is the relatively thin 'shell' and all the welding current has to flow through that thin 'shell' and thus the metal runs a bit 'hotter' than the solid wire where the current can flow through the entire bit of solid wire (as well as the process difference with the arc and the polarity and so forth).
Hence the 'little' machines usually show the material thickness/parameter chart with the FCAW listed as letting you weld a little bit thicker than the GMAW.
But no matter what, just keep in mind the general welding rule-of-thumb: 1 amp per each 0.001" thickness of material you are trying to weld.
ex: welding some 1/8" thick steel (0.125" thick) = ~125 amps welding current
Also note: Lincoln NR211-MP FCAW wire has a stated MAX welded material workpiece thickness limit of 5/16" using wire sizes of 0.045" and smaller (all that you would/could use on the 'smaller' machines anyway). Directly from Lincoln's specs. NR211-MP wire in sizes of 0.068" and up have a MAX workpiece thickness of 1/2". NR-212 is rated at MAX workpiece thickness up to 3/4" (if your machine had enough amps to let you attempt to weld on a workpiece that thick).
re: Dual-Shield (FCAW-G) wires. Forget it for all the 'little' machines.
NONE of the 'little' machines have the correct voltage/amperage outputs to run those type wires. Again, this falls under the
RTFM reminder.
If you are using FCAW on a 'little' machine, it is an FCAW-S wire (Flux Core Arc Welding - SelfShielding). Do
NOT go and run gas shielding when using an FCAW-S wire.