To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

Proto or Wright

HandyManny

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 13, 2009
Messages
2,239
Location
Out West
I work at the research center of a large oil company and we have box after box of Snap-on tools in the machine shop to impress American and foreign dignitaries when they tour the center. However, we also use a combination of Wright and Proto tools in the field under some of the worst conditions you can imagine. They may not be as "pretty" as Snap-on, but they function every bit as well (or better in some cases). People can be seriously injured or die in the oil field when a tool fails so we select tools based on quality, durability and function (not how "pretty" they are).

Sad how it's always the true genuine workhorse who never actually get the credit it deserves from the world. I'd hate to be a dignitary or in an equivelent position. They only know what they've been told or displayed from people who lie to them or misrepresent to them all the time. That would ****. I'd get sick of that ****.
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

GrantCee

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 23, 2010
Messages
808
Location
Willamette Valley, Oregon
I'd probably have a bit more Wright wrenches if they made longer patterned combo wrenches as their standard length. [...] I've always prefered and have owned Proto wrenches and that's what I favor

I've got some (older but not vintage) Proto SAE combo wrenches, and a brand-spanking-new Wright SAE combo set. Aside from not seeing any QC issues with the Wrights (they're perfect in every way), their standard pattern wrenches are significantly longer than the same-size Protos.

But you prefer Proto over Wright, because the Wrights are too short? What am I missing?
 

BB26

Well-known member
Joined
May 2, 2009
Messages
583
Location
oregon
I've got some (older but not vintage) Proto SAE combo wrenches, and a brand-spanking-new Wright SAE combo set. Aside from not seeing any QC issues with the Wrights (they're perfect in every way), their standard pattern wrenches are significantly longer than the same-size Protos.

But you prefer Proto over Wright, because the Wrights are too short? What am I missing?

The Proto combo wrenches currently in production are longer than Wright's current wrenches. I have full sets of both brands in SAE and Metric, all of which were purchased in the last two years.

I have a ton of tools from both brands. My preference varies based on the type of tool.

Ratchets -- Both are great, but I just love the new Proto pear heads. Amazing fit, finish and feel.

Wrenches -- Wright, the beams are just more comfortable.

Sockets -- Proto, the cold forming manufacturing process leads to a more precise tool. Fantastic fit and finish.

Breaker Bars -- Wright. These suckers are heavy duty. I'm not sure I could break one. I also like their ball and dimple detent design.
 

nikonica

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 23, 2009
Messages
124
Location
Seattle
I have an old set of Proto metric combination wrenches, a newer set of Proto Anti-Slip Design (ASD) metric combination wrenches, and also a new set of Wright metric combination wrenches. The old Protos are the shortest, the Wrights are a little longer than those, and then the newest Proto ASD wrenches are substantially longer than the Wrights. The Proto ASDs are by far the longest wrenches I've come across, including S-K, K-D, and Williams Supercombos. So Proto's standard combination wrench is what I would call "long-pattern," although I'm sure there are other brands (Snap-On, Matco, etc.) that are longer.

As far as Proto vs. Wright, I think both are good choices. Most Proto tools are made in Dallas, TX, and most Wright tools are made in Barberton, OH. Yes, Proto is owned by Stanley, but Stanley is an American corporation and Protos are indeed made in an American factory by American workers. Why not support the part of Stanley that is still doing something the way they have for so long? Both are marketed towards industrial users including manufacturing, mining, oil production and refining, government contracts, commercial aviation, railroads, etc. They are unquestionably heavy-duty tools. I also can say that I haven't had any quality control or durability issues with either brand. All the Proto and Wright sockets, drive tools, wrenches, etc. that I've owned have been formed perfectly, fit fasteners well, are uniformly produced, and have flawless chrome.

The finish is as good as S-K or Snap-On, and the only difference between those tools and Proto and Wright seems to be the heft of the tools - the industrial tools have slightly thicker socket walls and wrench beams, whereas the automotive tools are thinner and lighter, clearly designed to facilitate access in cramped automotive quarters.

You will not be disappointed with either - I'd go with whichever you can get the best deal on and have easy access to.

FWIW, I have a lot of newer "Blackhawk by Proto" tools, and while they are not the same tools as Proto (the tools are entirely different patterns from Proto), they are still made in the USA and are excellent. Blackhawk is less expensive, and I think the price difference is mostly a result of marketing differences and a much smaller range of tools, but I think the quality and durability is just the same. If country of origin is important to you, I recommend buying Blackhawk from a brick and mortar store, or at least confirming the country of origin over the phone if you're mail-ordering, because reportedly much of the Blackhawk line is produced offshore now. If that is indeed the case, there is still a lot of NOS USA-produced Blackhawk out there.
 
Last edited:

HandyManny

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 13, 2009
Messages
2,239
Location
Out West
I've got some (older but not vintage) Proto SAE combo wrenches, and a brand-spanking-new Wright SAE combo set. Aside from not seeing any QC issues with the Wrights (they're perfect in every way), their standard pattern wrenches are significantly longer than the same-size Protos.

But you prefer Proto over Wright, because the Wrights are too short? What am I missing?


Meaning that I have a couple sets of older standard length Proto combo wrenches that I love very much and used for years, but when I wanted to get a set of longer pattern wrenches I went with MAC instead, well that MAC set was stolen so later on I replaced them with the newer longer pattern from Proto. Wright didn't have an equivelent. As far as QC issues with Wright, maybe I just got unlucky in that purchase, but as I said my buddy also has some of the same issues on some of his newer Wright wrenches too. Maybe we were both just unlucky. Those newer Wrights I bought were a few pieces to complete an old set I had that was missing a few over the years. Tools are like pens, every once in a while people just walk off with them.
 

GrantCee

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 23, 2010
Messages
808
Location
Willamette Valley, Oregon
I have an old set of Proto metric combination wrenches, a newer set of Proto Anti-Slip Design (ASD) metric combination wrenches, and also a new set of Wright metric combination wrenches. The old Protos are the shortest, the Wrights are a little longer than those, and then the newest Proto ASD wrenches are substantially longer than the Wrights. The Proto ASDs are by far the longest wrenches I've come across, including S-K, K-D, and Williams Supercombos. So Proto's standard combination wrench is what I would call "long-pattern," although I'm sure there are other brands (Snap-On, Matco, etc.) that are longer.

Thanks for the clarification - I'd assumed that Proto's wrenches were the same length they'd always been!

Personally, I'm not sure I like longer wrenches. Having gotten used to the shorter wrenches over the years, I'm a little concerned about clearance in tight spaces. We'll see - I think I'll keep my short Protos around just in case.
 
OP
S

spencejm

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 18, 2007
Messages
64
Location
Columbia, MO
Comparing prices on 18 piece combination wrench sets I've found that the Protos are over $100 more than the the Wrights. Both are fully polished. Of course the only place I've found with Proto is MSC and Grainger so that may be part of the problem. I need to check with Grainger and see if my employment with the VA will get me a discount.
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

bayou985

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 16, 2008
Messages
100
Location
S.E. LA. SWAMPS
We used Wright 1/2 rats and sockets building a Co-Gen at USS the rats were bullet proof but not the smoothest... Sockets were sockets ok... screwdrivers were the Wright 91 series tips did'nt hold up to good...Wright satin finish end wrenches are great got some for Myself
 

redsky49

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 21, 2009
Messages
582
Location
near the coast in eastern North Carolina

JayL

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 17, 2008
Messages
1,789
Location
Manila, Philippines
I got the Wright 714 Set. Satin Finish 3/8 - 1 1/4

2-5.jpg


1-5.jpg


Looks like the middle wrench missed quality control.

3-1.jpg


Can't complain for the price paid. $40 from a local ads here ( slightly used ).

Japanese Aigo same 3/8 to 1 1/4" ( 14 pcs ) cost $106.
 
Last edited:

Keep

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 1, 2009
Messages
1,398
Location
Oshawa, Ontario
I have very few Proto tools, but the wrenches I have are very comfortable in my hands. As for ratchets and sockets, I have Wright and have been very happy for the year I have been using them.
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!
Top Bottom