To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

Read Only for Old Posts

Fedwrench

ALLIANCE MEMBER
Joined
Dec 9, 2007
Messages
14,963
Location
Valley of the sun
There have been many old threads brought back to life for more rehashing lately. Is there a way to make threads older than a year to be read only? If someone has new material relating to an old thread they could start a new thread with their fresh comments about new tool models or techniques. It's just a thought as I read a few threads today that had a few year gap between posts.
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

Uncle Buck

Banned
Joined
Mar 7, 2005
Messages
9,120
Location
Kansas
Getting tired of reading threads 2-3 years old. Something has to happen soon, once in a while is one thing, but this is getting out of hand! At first it didn't bother me but this is nuts, whoever is doing this needs to stop, or it needs to be controlled administratively.
 

LoneGunman

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 27, 2007
Messages
2,081
Location
The Gunshine state
It happens on every forum, what's the big deal? How much time could you guys have wasted by clicking it, seeing the date and moving on, 10 seconds?
 

bmwpower

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
12,578
Location
NJ
Personally, I never agreed with those kind of rules. There's the "don't bump old threads" rule, then at the same time there's the "use the search rule" on other boards. It's like you can't win. You get yelled at for bumping an old thread or not searching for an old one that may have pertinent info. I say bump it as long as long as you have something worthwhile to say. There's a lot of good info on here.

My 2 cents....
 

nissan_crawler

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 12, 2008
Messages
9,638
Location
Wichita, KS
Posting in an old thread where it's related to something relevant to what you want to know is fine, IMHO.

Posting in old threads just to read what you typed and raise your post count needs to quit.

As far as I'm concerned, there's only one member in particular that's the problem with this, and it's getting really old. Sorry, nobody cares about your input on something that was resolved 3 years ago, especially when you have nothing worthwhile to say about it. Nothing pisses me off more than reading 4 pages of old posts to get the background info, only to find some schmo had to throw his $.02 in and was wasting everybody's time.
 

bmwpower

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
12,578
Location
NJ
If anyone has a problem with a post, please report it so it can be tracked. :)
 

shocksystems

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 17, 2007
Messages
497
Location
Ipswich, MA USA
Personally, I never agreed with those kind of rules. There's the "don't bump old threads" rule, then at the same time there's the "use the search rule" on other boards. It's like you can't win. You get yelled at for bumping an old thread or not searching for an old one that may have pertinent info. I say bump it as long as long as you have something worthwhile to say. There's a lot of good info on here.

My 2 cents....

I completely agree. Enough rules. Taking this option away would mean that for every frivolous post prevented you also prevent 10 worthwhile bumps of old threads. Even worse people would then start new threads with the same topics as old threads and some people would need to re-post the same ideas they had in the past on the new thread.

Jim
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

CatfishXpress

Well-known member
Joined
May 16, 2007
Messages
290
Location
A big piece of steel in the Gulf of Mexico
I think it all boils down to a post count issue. Some people seem to think they have more clout if they have a high post count. So they are dredging up old threads and posting to them to raise their post count.

Perhaps the members post count shouldn't be displayed. We all know who the senior members are around here without having to look at the post count.
 

Uncle Buck

Banned
Joined
Mar 7, 2005
Messages
9,120
Location
Kansas
I think it all boils down to a post count issue. Some people seem to think they have more clout if they have a high post count. So they are dredging up old threads and posting to them to raise their post count.

Perhaps the members post count shouldn't be displayed. We all know who the senior members are around here without having to look at the post count.

It is not old timers around here doing this is it? :headscrat
 

nissan_crawler

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 12, 2008
Messages
9,638
Location
Wichita, KS
If anyone has a problem with a post, please report it so it can be tracked. :)

I'll flat out say it. Look up any post replied to be rhandwor in the last two weeks. Half of them spam the same company, the other half are bringing up 3 year old posts to tell them how to fix something, when the post says it was taken care of 3 years ago.

I did report several of the posts, nothing happened, so I quit.

A current example off the top of my head is the KAL tool thread.
 

caper

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 12, 2006
Messages
3,185
Location
cape breton
Seems like he plugs the same companies quite a bit when he brings thses posts back from the dead.Does he have some connection to any of them?
 

caper

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 12, 2006
Messages
3,185
Location
cape breton
The aggravating thing is reading three pages of text and then finding his name and realizing its an old thread.Or not realizing that your posting stuff to help someone who's issue is three years old and isn't even on the board anymore.
 

a390st

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 9, 2008
Messages
920
I posted a reply to a couple of these stupid deals the other day before I realized what was going on. I hate that I kept them going, but I actually thought they were current threads and just didn't realize they were old. This one person is the entire cause of the problem. It isn't that these threads should be locked necessarily, but that this one person is screwing up the board for everyone. I don't mind an old thread if it is relevant, but this guy is just dragging up old threads to spam us.
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!
Top Bottom