bushmechanic
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2014
- Messages
- 4,820
It's happened before, but recently, two very interesting threads, in which both I posted carefully considered thoughts, were deleted.
Not just locked, removed from space and time.
Everyone was behaving nicely, and in at least one of them a discussion bridging national borders that might have been building up understanding, if not outright acceptance, had commenced.
We have a long-standing, incredibly popular thread where all of us can post pictures of our firearms, and yet we cannot have a thread in which a genuinely curious citizen of a different nation asks why we have them in the first place.
Isn't that what information exchange is all about? How can we come to understand each other when the only places to do so are in the comments sections of news articles.
This thread was great. Differing opinions were respected, and understanding was being engendered.
We've established that Garage Journal is a place to picture privately owned firearms in what amounts to a photo gallery, but we've also established that Garage Journal is a place in which their place (or lack thereof; whichever the case may be) in our national hearts must be spoken in hushed whisper.
The same goes for the deleted thread regarding minimum wage musings. This is probably the most relevant subject to grace this forum in a very long time.
From country of origin issues with tools, all the way to the Harbor Freight debate, and including the launch of new tools that excite many of us; this subject exists at the heart of it all.
Likewise does it exist within any observations or opinions in regard to youth today displaying any difference in behavior or work ethic in contrast with "the old days".
This is a place where everyone, every day, talks right around every point in both the deleted threads. Those concerns are at the very heart of everything we discuss.
Does that make them "politics", somehow? Is discussing owning a gun or paying an employee any worse than extolling the virtues of knock-off tools and firearm photograph expertise?
I, for one, find it irritating to be hushed in such a manner.
Rules are rules, and that's fine, but when they break themselves before anyone has a chance to explore their limits, they are simply tools to be used in fear and/or censorship.
That being the case, I submit that "politics" as used in the regulatory language should be strictly defined.
So far as I can tell, the current unillustrated definition is:
Politics: Speak of what you will, but neither how nor why, in any context of history or current event; exhibit controversy, but never discuss it.
We had two threads where people were genuinely getting somewhere in discussion, and now they are gone. That is a loss. Luckily, I saved one of my posts for use elsewhere, but I shouldn't have needed to.
Here's my own opinion: As a place so darn concerned with what comes from where and who made it, as well as who works where and why, Garage Journal should have the stones to allow discussion of the issues below the surface.
It's cowardice otherwise.
Not just locked, removed from space and time.
Everyone was behaving nicely, and in at least one of them a discussion bridging national borders that might have been building up understanding, if not outright acceptance, had commenced.
We have a long-standing, incredibly popular thread where all of us can post pictures of our firearms, and yet we cannot have a thread in which a genuinely curious citizen of a different nation asks why we have them in the first place.
Isn't that what information exchange is all about? How can we come to understand each other when the only places to do so are in the comments sections of news articles.
This thread was great. Differing opinions were respected, and understanding was being engendered.
We've established that Garage Journal is a place to picture privately owned firearms in what amounts to a photo gallery, but we've also established that Garage Journal is a place in which their place (or lack thereof; whichever the case may be) in our national hearts must be spoken in hushed whisper.
The same goes for the deleted thread regarding minimum wage musings. This is probably the most relevant subject to grace this forum in a very long time.
From country of origin issues with tools, all the way to the Harbor Freight debate, and including the launch of new tools that excite many of us; this subject exists at the heart of it all.
Likewise does it exist within any observations or opinions in regard to youth today displaying any difference in behavior or work ethic in contrast with "the old days".
This is a place where everyone, every day, talks right around every point in both the deleted threads. Those concerns are at the very heart of everything we discuss.
Does that make them "politics", somehow? Is discussing owning a gun or paying an employee any worse than extolling the virtues of knock-off tools and firearm photograph expertise?
I, for one, find it irritating to be hushed in such a manner.
Rules are rules, and that's fine, but when they break themselves before anyone has a chance to explore their limits, they are simply tools to be used in fear and/or censorship.
That being the case, I submit that "politics" as used in the regulatory language should be strictly defined.
So far as I can tell, the current unillustrated definition is:
Politics: Speak of what you will, but neither how nor why, in any context of history or current event; exhibit controversy, but never discuss it.
We had two threads where people were genuinely getting somewhere in discussion, and now they are gone. That is a loss. Luckily, I saved one of my posts for use elsewhere, but I shouldn't have needed to.
Here's my own opinion: As a place so darn concerned with what comes from where and who made it, as well as who works where and why, Garage Journal should have the stones to allow discussion of the issues below the surface.
It's cowardice otherwise.