To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

Running nm cable in attic

dutzk

Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2016
Messages
10
My garage attic has an opening for access. The attic will have blown in insulation. Can I run cable diagonally across the ceiling joists? Joists are 24 oc. While trying to find the answer to this I came across people saying if ran on top on the joist the cable needs to be protected if within 6 ft of scuttle hole. Is this correct even if the cables will be covered with blow in cellulose and not have foot traffic?







Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

Cmreschke

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 15, 2014
Messages
775
Location
North of Detroit
Yes this is correct. I'm within 6 ft of scuttle you need to protect it. Run a 2x4 next to it. Also if your running close to the crotch of the truss by the splice plates then you should protect it there as well.
 

Falcon67

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 11, 2009
Messages
18,371
Location
Merkel, TX
Houses here have "romex" running every which way and not "protected" in any fashion. They do staple inside the walls. In this house there are about 8-10 runs next to the attic stairs, maybe 3" from the hole. I've been in a LOT of houses and seen plenty wired, never ever seen anything like above. Not here, not Fort Worth/Dallas, not Houston. If it's a requirement, it's ignored by builders and inspectors.
 
Last edited:

matt_i

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 14, 2008
Messages
10,725
Location
SE Michigan
As above, every other truss, if run perpendicular, should be 4' oc. If run diagonally, you'd have to measure, could be a staple every truss. DOn't drill the trusses no matter what.
 

Cmreschke

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 15, 2014
Messages
775
Location
North of Detroit
You don't have to staple on top of trusses here. It is considered support just by laying on top. As long as you staple on the vertical when it goes into your holes or horizontal say at a turn it would be considered secure as well.

For neatness factor can you avoid running diagonally and run it perpendicular and parallel to the trusses? Would look much neater and you will have better chance of not hitting wire up there if your ever walking around.
 

2Big2Ride

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 24, 2010
Messages
258
Location
d/FW, Texas - more FW than D
Houses here have "romex" running every which way and not "protected" in any fashion. They do staple inside the walls. In this house there are about 8-10 runs next to the attic stairs, maybe 3" from the hole. I've been in a LOT of houses and seen plenty wired, never ever seen anything like above. Not here, not Fort Worth/Dallas, not Houston. If it's a requirement, it's ignored by builders and inspectors.
The NM in our attic looks like a pile of spaghetti noodles - located near Fort Worth. Don't think there is a staple on anything running horizontal and no protection. Our old house in SW Washington state followed a common path from the panel through the attic, all routed nicely, in a safe place, and stapled nice and neat. Work of art compared to the way it was done in this house.
 
OP
D

dutzk

Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2016
Messages
10
I called my inspector, he said diagonal is ok. He read the code about protection within 6 ft of scuttle. When I say read, he read it right out of the book as if not too familiar with it until I brought it up. When I asked him how he recommends protecting cables he wasn't sure and said to check a hardware store. after that conversation I think he's going to be lenient on that.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

gnxtc2

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 3, 2010
Messages
304
Location
New york
See 310.15(B)(2)(a) and 310.15(B)(3)(a) aka: bundling of 4 or more and longer than 24". There is no clear definition of bundling in the NEC. That's why I said "could". Bundling is up to the interpretation of the inspector.

More Than Three Current-Carrying Conductors in a Raceway or Cable. Where the number of current-carrying conductors in a raceway or cable exceeds three, OR where single conductors or multiconductor cables are installed without maintaining spacing for a continuous length longer than 600 mm (24 in.) and are not installed in raceways, the allowable ampacity of each conductor shall be reduced as shown in Table 310.15(B)(2)(a). Each current-carrying conductor of a paralleled set of conductors shall be counted as a current-carrying conductor.

If you replaced the zip ties with stackers, you'll have no issues.

Billy T.
[email protected]
 
Last edited:

Showkey

"MEMBER EMERITUS"
Joined
Aug 9, 2014
Messages
8,638
Location
Wausau WI
Houses here have "romex" running every which way and not "protected" in any fashion. They do staple inside the walls. In this house there are about 8-10 runs next to the attic stairs, maybe 3" from the hole. I've been in a LOT of houses and seen plenty wired, never ever seen anything like above. Not here, not Fort Worth/Dallas, not Houston. If it's a requirement, it's ignored by builders and inspectors.


Pretty much the same here in Wisconsin.
 

rburke65

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 10, 2007
Messages
12,349
Location
Canfield, Ohio
I have seen the every which way in lots of attics, but this was in a rewire situation.....no inspection. Just what I have seen when I got up into the attic. They could inspect MY work....no problem.....but I have seen some real spaghetti in attics.
 

lakeroadster

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 19, 2015
Messages
5,166
Location
Central Colorado
See 310.15(B)(2)(a) and 310.15(B)(3)(a) aka: bundling of 4 or more and longer than 24". There is no clear definition of bundling in the NEC. That's why I said "could". Bundling is up to the interpretation of the inspector.

More Than Three Current-Carrying Conductors in a Raceway or Cable. Where the number of current-carrying conductors in a raceway or cable exceeds three, OR where single conductors or multiconductor cables are installed without maintaining spacing for a continuous length longer than 600 mm (24 in.) and are not installed in raceways, the allowable ampacity of each conductor shall be reduced as shown in Table 310.15(B)(2)(a). Each current-carrying conductor of a paralleled set of conductors shall be counted as a current-carrying conductor.

If you replaced the zip ties with stackers, you'll have no issues.

Billy T.
[email protected]

Thanks Billy.
 
Last edited:

homemade1487

Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2014
Messages
23
A friend of mine who is a master electrician. Whenever it comes to bundling multiple nm conductors, he just uses one staple every 4' and every 6" out of a box. Zip ties the bundle to the staple but no zip ties between the staples.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!
Top Bottom