Adam,
You seem frustrated that SK doesn't make exactly what you want. Everything is too small, not enough, etc. Let's think about that. SK expanded their product line, I think around the Facom years, and carried a lot of tools. I once had a pilot bearing tool remover from the 1990s, and they offered items that are no longer available. As a business decision, they are working on their core business. They are doing so in a way that doesn't involve manufacturing every specialty tool under the sun. Every manufacturer has to slim their offerings down. Various account practices make competition in the marketplace tight. In this case, a U.S. company
shouldn't offer a tool that's already made overseas, imported and available if they would just be entering that particular sector (of x-long double flex head box wrenches for example.)
Similarly, the 3870 roto head (and the 43875 for different reasons) dropped out of the marketplace around when imported roto ratchets were available from several manufacturers. I love my 3870, I would buy a 43875 if I ran across one at the right time, and I'd even buy the Facom labeled version but haven't found one yet. I am used to the design, the knurled handle, length, shape, feel, and utility feel
right to me so much that I don't like pear head or flex-handle ratchets. Look at Jeff Moss's signature some time. Three generations using the same PN. I'm not going to elaborate on how many years SK ratchets have provided bulletproof service for members of my family, but they kick a lot of pear-heads in the gutter with regard to durability in my hands-on experience.
You're a bit overboard with the numbers, statistics, and ratchet measuring. People who are out kicking **** in the real world aren't furiously measuring things like wrenches, they're buying them. Market penetration isn't about doing a sophomoric tool analysis, it's about putting your name on product that works, works, tomorrow, and works after years of legitimate work underhood, not at the keyboard. SK's core product line aims for that, and doesn't apologize when it's sitting in your toolbox 15 years later, unscathed.
There's a lot more to product selection and introduction based on profitability than meets the eye. Most of what we yap about on this forum has nothing to do with the decisions made by an Ideal Industries, or a Stanley. At this time, SK's decisions seem methodical and slow, but they endeavor to release product with lots of reason behind it. Not using the gimmicks you mentioned. And I like that about them.
I don't apologize for not buying every tool SK offers, and they don't apologize for not offering every tool they
could introduce. I assure you I over-analyze many purchases I make and they are putting good business analysis towards the products they introduce.
-J