Your preaching to the choir dude. I buy good footwear. Always have but as many other have said here the boots break down. The sole, arch, and upper break down you lose ankle support and yourbsoles wear even if you think they haven't THEY HAVE. Throw that name redwing around all you want. Do you know what "redwing" is these days? Well over half is Chinese built garbage. So if you spend $350 that doent make the boot last any longer than my $220 throrogoods or my $250 american made Carolina 505's . (I dont pay those prices for either of these because i shop around and buy them on sale) so yeah if your bragging about spending $350 every 5 years + cuz "I bought me some fancy boots" your still a cheap ***, your still hurting your back, hips, and knees. Dont believe me talk to a doctor. You may not feel it yet but you will eventually.
There is so much wrong in this statement I almost don't know where to start.
First off, you telling me what my shoes or boots are doing to my body is simply ridiculous. If I try wearing boots or shoes that have a springy insole, lots of cushion, or soft soles my feet hurt, and I hate the way they feel. Further, if wearing old boots was going to cause a problem, I'm pretty sure I would have known it after doing stuff like ******* a 70lb pack for 10 miles wearing jungle boots that were 5 years old....20 years later, no ankle, knee, hip, or back problems.
Top quality boots and shoes don't break down nearly as quickly as you're suggesting they do, and the kind of boots/shoes factors into it as well.
At times I've worn a suit five days a week, so I have several pairs of Allen Edmonds dress shoes that I've been wearing for over ten years. The soles are leather, the heels are hard as a rock, and they have minimal cushion anywhere. They haven't changed one bit since they broke in, and Allen Edmonds says they can "recraft" them 2-3 times, which equals many years of use before they need to be tossed. Why would they say that when they're in the business of selling more shoes?
The reason the kind of boots/shoes factors in is that for some styles there isn't much that can deteriorate. Go look at a pair of the Danner Ft. Lewis boots I mention below, or the copy by Matterhorn (also had a pair of those) and you'll see there's nothing that's going to compress or break down over time...they don't have any real give in them from the start, on purpose.
Running shoes or others with a lot of cushion in the sole are a completely different story, but that's not what we're talking about here.
The Redwing boots I have are 100% made in the U.S., not their imported models, so I'm very aware of where they are made, and what they are "these days."
I wasn't bragging by mentioning the Redwings....just pointing out that I have them, and they aren't cheap. I actually have other boots that cost more if we want to really get technical. As I recall, my Danner Ft. Lewis Go Devils were more expensive than the Redwings. I'm pretty sure my dress shoes cost a bit more than the Redwings as well.
I also have hiking shoes by Merrell and Asolo. The Merrells have a fairly springy insole and some give to the sole. I always thought they were great and went through several pairs until I was given a pair of Asolo Fugitive GTX and I'm getting ready to buy a second pair so I can alternate them and get rid of the Merrells. The Asolo have a very firm insole and a very hard sole, and when I wear them all day walking back and forth on concrete, my feet feel better than when I wear the Merrells (or the Danner Pronghorns I have two pairs of).
I don't consider Redwings "fancy" at all...just very good quality if you buy their better models. Based upon how long I see them lasting, they're worth it.
So no, I'm not a cheap *** at all, I just know what works best for me (and lots of other people who disagree with you). I should point out, that if you want to insult someone by suggesting that they're being a cheap ***, you might want to at least write it properly. It's "you're a cheap ***" not "your a cheap ***."