yes, i made the equation. Absent evidence to the contrary, code compliant is the default. Not sure i understand the missouri reference... Must be some inferiority complex that folks from indiana have...
missouri's state moto is the "show me" state. Sorry for assuming this was common knowledge
all the same can be said for sweated copper... And your point (besides the top of your head...)?
burrs don't knick copper fittings and if you don't clean them properly before soldering you will not get a good joint that will leak immediately at commissioning most of the time
is it 10 years or 15 years? Which is it?
i thought that by asking for data you understood failure rates. For things such as fittings, many companies use a mean failure rate per 10 years. Other things such as engines may use failure rates per so many hours.
15 years is the length of time that "i" personally recall sharkbites being on the common market
and we can always trust the second hand opinions of your network. As long as they aren't from missouri...
i have 20 years experience as a mechanic, and 15 is for the largest engine manufacture in the world. I know a thing or two about oring failure. 20 years is the designed lifespan of o rings and rate drastically increase. Even the most durable of equipment will typically of been rebuilt by this point. In our factory there was a section installed in 97. Every week we are replacing filters bowls and parker pushlocks(similar to sharkbites for urethane tubing)
so this is your gripe... Really?? Literally millions (dare i say billions or trillions) of fittings that channel liquid rely on rubber o-rings are used around the globe - from water to fuel and everything in between. These have proven to last decades.
20 years is not that long in the life of a house. It should be criminal (imho) to place a product that has that life span inside a wall where upon failure it can do thousands of worth of damage just because someone is to lazy.
ok. So you have no data. Just conjecture. Thanks for the confirmation.
i have no data of sharkbites because the company wont release it nor has anyone compiled it. That doesn't make it so. But there is plenty of data that is available on orings. Is parker a trusted provider of information?
https://www.parker.com/literature/o-ring%20division%20literature/ord%205700%20parker_o-ring_handbook.pdf see section 2.6 ozone listed there to that you found so humorous
can list many other references as well but a simple google search of "o ring failures will give you the same results
based on your logic, we should through out copper too. It can develop pin holes through no human fault...
yes, if exposed to acid water in thinner thicknesses i have only personally seen it several times and always with m weight copper. L and k this is a non issue unless you have very acidic water. Many jurisdiction only allow m weight for closed loop heating for this reason, but unfortunately other jurisdiction don't have this rule
let's through out cpvc also. The glue can dry and crack.
yes we should, see post 23. First pvc is not glued, it is solvent welded. Second it does not dry out it work hardens and becomes brittle. Works great for dwv applications however
pex is unproven over the long term. We shouldn't rely on it then.
60 years is unproven? Pex a/wirsbro fittings are very proven (propex) pex b not as much and the crimp fittings are more restrictive and really on the person crimping to ensure a proper crimp with can be assured with a go/no go gage. However this step is omitted frequently.. But also in post 23 i listed zurn pex, do to substandard fittings billions of dollars have been caused, code approved however
i suspect that your potable water is managed with galvanized pipe and pipe dope. At least it will never leak!
really reaching hard? All l weight copper and propex . There are stand pipes of galvanized pipe on my frost proof hydrants in the pastures.