What is wrong with SK?
I think the idea is that the softer center allows the drive end and fastener ends of the socket to be much harder than a traditional impact socket.I feel like this is just like the X-frame wrenches. It seems like they have invented a problem and then solved it. I've worn out many an impact socket but NEVER there, it's always the drive end.
Dont get me confused with an SK hater, I'm a huge fan of their tools. I just think these sockets and their X-frame wrenches are gimmicky, and again solve a problem I've never had. I've never had a socket fail there and I've never had a wrench break there!
I think that's the point: they are hardening the places where they do fail.I've never had a socket fail there ...
This thread actually reminded me that I've signed up for SK Club pro and have yet to receive any benefits.SK, lets have some double box versions of your new ratcheting wrench design, some 1/4 and 1/2 drive versions of your new pear head ratchets, regular and flex, and bring back the rotohead! There is almost no design work to be done on any of those, just tool up and watch the money roll in.

This thread actually reminded me that I've signed up for SK Club pro and have yet to receive any benefits.
Nevertheless, I just went to their Site and noticed a new tab that wasn't there a week ago called "Resources" where I found product sheets for all the new stuff.
So I Re-Download the new "LP90" product sheet and to my surprise it only lists the standard handle versions with no mention of any flex head variant. BUT! once I searched the actual product numbers I found that ALL THREE DRIVE SIZES ARE AVAILABLE AND CURRENTLY IN STOCK!!!
Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk
Jeez. SK gets criticized for not releasing new products, and then when they do. Tough crowd.
This thread actually reminded me that I've signed up for SK Club pro and have yet to receive any benefits.
Nevertheless, I just went to their Site and noticed a new tab that wasn't there a week ago called "Resources" where I found product sheets for all the new stuff.
So I Re-Download the new "LP90" product sheet and to my surprise it only lists the standard handle versions with no mention of any flex head variant. BUT! once I searched the actual product numbers I found that ALL THREE DRIVE SIZES ARE AVAILABLE AND CURRENTLY IN STOCK!!!
Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk
Nice! My 84t Craftsman premium 1/4" ratchet just started locking up on me.Time to replace with SK I guess!


I'll have to check with Epstein's to see if they have the new ratchets in stock.
Placed my order today. As soon as we get them in, they'll go up on the website.

Great idea, though these sockets probably won't hit quite as hard as normal uniformly hardened impact sockets, so may have trouble busting really tight/rusted fasteners loose.
If the center area is the same hardness as a normal impact socket (I don't know if that's true, but let's assume for the sake of discussion) and both ends are harder, would this socket hit harder, just as hard, or not as hard as the regular socket? Why?
Did you like that Craftsman Premium set? I remember wanting them years ago, but thinking that the price was too high. I can't remember how much that they cost. When I saw all three of the new SK together the set reminded me of the Craftsman ones without the flat handles. I wonder what the difference in price for the Craftsman set was to what the SK set will be at Harry Epstein's.
The premiums are pretty nice but are really heavy. The handles are a little longer and are super beefy. The weren't really that pricey from what I remember. I bought the 3 piece set for under $100 I think. I later lost my 1/4" some how (along with a 10mm socket?!) and bought a replacement on eBay. Here recently it started locking up so I took it apart, cleaned and lubed but its still doing it. Ive considered upgrading to the matco 88 mechanism but it will cost me around $30 after shipping.
I think retail on them was $125 for the set. I like mine - the flat handle allows you to more comfortably "get on it" for stubborn fasteners. That mostly comes in handy on the 1/2" model. The 1/4" is known for issues, although I've been lucky with mine so far.
I've worked in full-CNC machine/job shops, who specialized in rapid tooling up for production parts. Even with the most sophisticated CAD/CAM and most modern equipment available, it would still sometimes take months and months of work before we could consistently make parts to spec and profitably.I'm bothered by SK's slow pace, too. Surely it can't be that difficult to tool up a new line to make a ratcheting double box, or a flex handle for the pearhead?
How about it, SK? Why the delays?
Has anybody used these, seen them used, or watched a review of these?
I got a free one during socket of the month back in February or March and used it a bunch of times. I don't notice anything different than my regular impacts.

Great idea, though these sockets probably won't hit quite as hard as normal uniformly hardened impact sockets, so may have trouble busting really tight/rusted fasteners loose.

You can put it on a rockwell tester to find the hardness.No way of knowing without the actual figures on hardness of the middle steel compared to the hardness of a regular impact socket. The difference probably won't be too great, but the fact is that if it's designed to flex, that flexion is eating up impact power. Just like a torque stick or any old regular extension.